Osseointegration of implant surfaces in metabolic syndrome and type‐2 diabetes mellitus
Edmara T. P. Bergamo, Paula Gabriela Faciola Pessôa de Oliveira, Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos, Estevam A. Bonfante, Nick Tovar, Daniel Boczar, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Paulo G. Coelho, Lukasz Witek
Abstract
This in vivo study evaluated the bone healing response around endosteal implants with varying surface topography/chemistry in a preclinical, large transitional model induced with metabolic syndrome (MS) and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Fifteen Göttingen minipigs were randomly distributed into two groups: (i) control (normal diet, n = 5) and (ii) O/MS (cafeteria diet for obesity induction, n = 10). Following obesity induction, five minipigs from the obese/metabolic syndrome (O/MS) group were further allocated, randomly, into the third experimental group: (iii) T2DM (cafeteria diet + streptozotocin). Implants with different surface topography/chemistry: (i) dual acid-etched (DAE) and (ii) nano-hydroxyapatite coating over the DAE surface (NANO), were placed into the right ilium of the subjects and allowed to heal for 4 weeks. Histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads were performed using histomicrographs. Implants with NANO surface presented significantly higher %BIC (~26%) and %BAFO (~35%) relative to implants with DAE surface (%BIC = ~14% and %BAFO = ~28%, p < .025). Data as a function of systemic condition presented significantly higher %BIC (~28%) and %BAFO (~42%) in the control group compared with the metabolically compromised groups (O/MS: %BIC = 14.35% and %BAFO = 26.24%, p < .021; T2DM: %BIC = 17.91% and %BAFO = 26.12%, p < .021) with no significant difference between O/MS and T2DM (p > .05). Statistical evaluation considering both factors demonstrated significantly higher %BIC and %BAFO for the NANO surface relative to DAE implant, independent of systemic condition (p < .05). The gain increase of %BIC and %BAFO for the NANO compared with DAE was more pronounced in O/MS and T2DM subjects. Osseointegration parameters were significantly reduced in metabolically compromised subjects compared with healthy subjects. Nanostructured hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces improved osseointegration relative to DAE, regardless of systemic condition.