Accuracy of Breast Ultrasonography and Mammography in Comparison with Postoperative Histopathology in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
G Schmidt, Sebastian Findeklee, Gerda del Sol Martinez, Mihai Géorgescu, Christoph Gerlinger, Sogand Nemat, Gilbert Georg Klamminger, Meletios P. Nigdelis, Erich‐Franz Solomayer, Bashar Haj Hamoud
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nowadays chemotherapy in breast cancer patients is optionally applied neoadjuvant, which allows for testing of tumor response to the chemotherapeutical treatment in vivo, as well as allowing a greater number of patients to benefit from a subsequent breast-conserving surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared breast ultrasonography, mammography, and clinical examination (palpation) results with postoperative histopathological findings after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, aiming to determine the most accurate prediction of complete remission and tumor-free resection margins. To this end, clinical and imaging data of 184 patients (193 tumors) with confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer and neoadjuvant therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: < 0.0001) of cases. Although mammography proved more accurate in estimating the exact neoadjuvant tumor size than breast sonography in total numbers (136/163 (83.44%) vs. 142/192 (73.96%), n.s.), 29 tumors could be assessed solely by means of breast sonography. A sonographic measurement was feasible in 192 cases (99.48%) post-chemotherapy and in all cases prior to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: We determined a superiority of mammography and breast sonography over clinical palpation in predicting neoadjuvant tumor size. However, neither examination method can predict either pCR or tumor margins with high confidence.