Evaluating Human–Robot Interaction Algorithms in Shared Autonomy via Quality Diversity Scenario Generation
Matthew C. Fontaine, Stefanos Nikolaidis
Abstract
The growth of scale and complexity of interactions between humans and robots highlights the need for new computational methods to automatically evaluate novel algorithms and applications. Exploring diverse scenarios of humans and robots interacting in simulation can improve understanding of the robotic system and avoid potentially costly failures in real-world settings. We formulate this problem as a quality diversity (QD) problem, of which the goal is to discover diverse failure scenarios by simultaneously exploring both environments and human actions. We focus on the shared autonomy domain, in which the robot attempts to infer the goal of a human operator, and adopt the QD algorithms CMA-ME and MAP-Elites to generate scenarios for two published algorithms in this domain: shared autonomy via hindsight optimization and linear policy blending. Some of the generated scenarios confirm previous theoretical findings, while others are surprising and bring about a new understanding of state-of-the-art implementations. Our experiments show that the QD algorithms CMA-ME and MAP-Elites outperform Monte-Carlo simulation and optimization-based methods in effectively searching the scenario space, highlighting their promise for automatic evaluation of algorithms in human–robot interaction.