Litcius/Paper detail

Systematic scoping review of the concept of ‘genetic identity’ and its relevance for germline modification

Floor M. Goekoop, Carla van El, Guy Widdershoven, Nadža Džinalija, Martina C. Cornel, Natalie Evans

2020PLoS ONE14 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

EU legislation prohibits clinical trials that modify germ line 'genetic identity'. 'Genetic identity' however, is left undefined. This study aims to identify the use of the term 'genetic identity' in academic literature, and investigate its relevance for debates on genetic modification. A total of 616 articles that contained the term were identified. Content analysis revealed that the term was used in various and contradicting ways and a clear understanding of the term is lacking. This review demonstrates that the EU legislation is open to interpretation, because of the diversity of meaning with which 'genetic identity' is currently used. Because of the diversity of meaning with which 'genetic identity' is used and understood, further reflection is needed. This requires further medical, legal, ethical and social debate and a coordinated response at both a European and a global level.

Topics & Concepts

Relevance (law)LegislationIdentity (music)Meaning (existential)Diversity (politics)Interpretation (philosophy)Genetic diversityGeneticsPolitical scienceEpistemologySociologyBiologyLawComputer sciencePopulationPhysicsProgramming languageAcousticsPhilosophyDemographyCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Systematic scoping review of the concept of ‘genetic identity’ and its relevance for germline modification | Litcius