Litcius/Paper detail

The efficacy of combining cognitive training and noninvasive brain stimulation: A transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anika Poppe, Franziska Ritter, Leonie Bais, James E. Pustejovsky, Marie‐José van Tol, Branislava Ćurĉić‐Blake, Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg, Lisette van der Meer

2023Psychological Bulletin24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

= 0.18, 95% CI [0.07, 0.29]) at postintervention, but not in the long term. The effect was small and limited by substantial heterogeneity. The other seven cognitive outcome domains, symptoms, and everyday functioning did not benefit from adding NIBS to CT. Given the methodological limitation of prior studies, more high-quality trials that focus on the potential of combining NIBS and CT to enhance benefits in everyday functioning in the short and long term are needed to evaluate whether combining NIBS and CT is relevant for clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Topics & Concepts

PsycINFOMeta-analysisMEDLINECognitionConfoundingBrain stimulationClinical psychologyMedicineRandomized controlled trialPsychologyCognitive psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryStimulationPolitical scienceLawNeurology and Historical StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesAnatomy and Medical Technology
The efficacy of combining cognitive training and noninvasive brain stimulation: A transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis. | Litcius