Litcius/Paper detail

Finding Correspondence between Metabolomic Features in Untargeted Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics Datasets

Rui Pinto, İbrahim Karaman, Matthew R. Lewis, Jenny Hällqvist, Manuja Kaluarachchi, Gonçalo Graça, Elena Chekmeneva, Brenan R. Durainayagam, Mohsen Ghanbari, M. Arfan Ikram, Henrik Zetterberg, Julian L. Griffin, Paul Elliott, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Abbas Dehghan, David M. Herrington, Timothy M. D. Ebbels

2022Analytical Chemistry26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

, and FI. We demonstrate the method on both real and synthetic datasets, using six orthogonal validation strategies to gauge the matching quality. In our main example, 4953 features were uniquely matched, of which 585 (96.8%) of 604 manually annotated features were correct. In a second example, 2324 features could be uniquely matched, with 79 (90.8%) out of 87 annotated features correctly matched. Most of the missed annotated matches are between features that behave very differently from modeled inter-dataset shifts of RT, MZ, and FI. In a third example with simulated data with 4755 features per dataset, 99.6% of the matches were correct. Finally, the results of matching three other dataset pairs using our method are compared with a published alternative method, metabCombiner, showing the advantages of our approach. The method can be applied using M2S (Match 2 Sets), a free, open-source MATLAB toolbox, available at https://github.com/rjdossan/M2S.

Topics & Concepts

MetabolomicsMatching (statistics)ChemistryMass spectrometryFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)ChromatographyArtificial intelligenceData miningComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsPhilosophyLinguisticsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyBioinformatics and Genomic Networks