Investigation of discordant SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results using minimally processed saliva
Dawn White, Jimmy Gu, Catherine‐Jean Steinberg, Deborah Yamamura, Bruno J. Salena, Cynthia Balion, Carlos D. M. Filipe, Alfredo Capretta, Yingfu Li, John D. Brennan
Abstract
Abstract Saliva is an attractive sample for coronavirus disease 2019 testing due its ease of collection and amenability to detect viral RNA with minimal processing. Using a direct-to-RT-PCR method with saliva self-collected from confirmed COVID-19 positive volunteers, we observed 32% false negative results. Confirmed negative and healthy volunteer samples spiked with 10 6 genome copies/mL of heat-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 showed false negative results of 10% and 13%, respectively. Additional sample heating or dilution of the false negative samples conferred only modest improvements. These results highlight the potential to significantly underdiagnose COVID-19 infections when testing directly from minimally processed heterogeneous saliva samples.