Assessing the impact of wastewater treatment works effluent on downstream water quality
Sean Comber, M.J. Gardner, Lauren Ansell, Brian Ellor
Abstract
The impact of wastewater treatment works (WwTW) effluent on downstream river water quality is of increasing concern, particularly owing to the presence in effluents of a range of trace substances. In the case of contamination by metals the question of bioavailability has recently been accounted for in setting water quality standards for several metals. In the UK over the past decade the Chemical Investigations Programme (CIP) has generated upstream and downstream river quality data as well as associated WwTW effluent monitoring for over 600 sites, for the main contaminants of regulatory interest under the Water Framework Directive. Data presented here show that at a local level WwTW discharges have little impact for many contaminants. Soluble reactive phosphorus, hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), cypermethrin, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) have been shown to be the principal substances where downstream concentrations were at least 10 % larger than the upstream value. Otherwise, poor compliance with riverine water quality standards tends to be associated with contamination at the river catchment scale, with corresponding implications for the nature of remedial actions that are likely to be successful. Compliance with water quality criteria for metals, taking account of bioavailability, is high overall.