Litcius/Paper detail

Uncovering Flooding Mechanisms Across the Contiguous United States Through Interpretive Deep Learning on Representative Catchments

Shijie Jiang, Yi Zheng, Chao Wang, Vladan Babovic

2021Water Resources Research231 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract Long short‐term memory (LSTM) networks represent one of the most prevalent deep learning (DL) architectures in current hydrological modeling, but they remain black boxes from which process understanding can hardly be obtained. This study aims to demonstrate the potential of interpretive DL in gaining scientific insights using flood prediction across the contiguous United States (CONUS) as a case study. Two interpretation methods were adopted to decipher the machine‐captured patterns and inner workings of LSTM networks. The DL interpretation by the expected gradients method revealed three distinct input‐output relationships learned by LSTM‐based runoff models in 160 individual catchments. These relationships correspond to three flood‐inducing mechanisms—snowmelt, recent rainfall, and historical rainfall—that account for 10.1%, 60.9%, and 29.0% of the 20,908 flow peaks identified from the data set, respectively. Single flooding mechanisms dominate 70.7% of the investigated catchments (11.9% snowmelt‐dominated, 34.4% recent rainfall‐dominated, and 24.4% historical rainfall‐dominated mechanisms), and the remaining 29.3% have mixed mechanisms. The spatial variability in the dominant mechanisms reflects the catchments' geographic and climatic conditions. Moreover, the additive decomposition method unveils how the LSTM network behaves differently in retaining and discarding information when emulating different types of floods. Information from inputs within previous time steps can be partially stored in the memory of LSTM networks to predict snowmelt‐induced and historical rainfall‐induced floods, while for recent rainfall‐induced floods, only recent information is retained. Overall, this study provides a new perspective for understanding hydrological processes and extremes and demonstrates the prospect of artificial intelligence‐assisted scientific discovery in the future.

Topics & Concepts

SnowmeltFlood mythFlooding (psychology)DECIPHERComputer scienceSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)Interpretation (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeographyEcologyGeneticsGeotechnical engineeringArchaeologyProgramming languagePsychotherapistPsychologyBiologyHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementHydrological Forecasting Using AI