Realizing square and diamond lattice <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> Heisenberg antiferromagnet models in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math> phases of the coordination framework, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mi>Ti</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>·</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Aly H. Abdeldaim, Teng Li, Lewis Farrar, Alexander A. Tsirlin, Wenjiao Yao, Alexandra S. Gibbs, Pascal Manuel, Philip Lightfoot, Gøran J. Nilsen, Lucy Clark
Abstract
We report the crystal structures and magnetic properties of two pseudopolymorphs of the $S=1/2 {\mathrm{Ti}}^{3+}$ coordination framework, $\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}x{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$. Single-crystal x-ray and powder neutron diffraction measurements on $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}x{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ confirm its structure in the tetragonal $I4/mcm$ space group with a square planar arrangement of ${\mathrm{Ti}}^{3+}$ ions. Magnetometry and specific heat measurements reveal weak antiferromagnetic interactions, with ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{\approx}7$ K and ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.11$ indicating a slight frustration of nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interactions. Below 1.8 K, $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}x{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ undergoes a transition to G-type antiferromagnetic order with magnetic moments aligned along the $c$ axis of the tetragonal structure. The estimated ordered moment of ${\mathrm{Ti}}^{3+}$ in $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}x{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ is suppressed from its spin-only value to $0.62(3)\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$, thus verifying the two-dimensional nature of the magnetic interactions within the system. $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}2{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$, on the other hand, realizes a three-dimensional diamondlike magnetic network of ${\mathrm{Ti}}^{3+}$ moments within a hexagonal $P{6}_{2}22$ structure. An antiferromagnetic exchange coupling of $J\ensuremath{\approx}54$ K---an order of magnitude larger than in $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}x{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$---is extracted from magnetometry and specific heat data. $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}2{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ undergoes N\'eel ordering at ${T}_{N}=28$ K, with the magnetic moments aligned within the $ab$ plane and a slightly reduced ordered moment of $0.79\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ per ${\mathrm{Ti}}^{3+}$. Through density-functional theory calculations, we address the origin of the large difference in the exchange parameters between the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ and $\ensuremath{\beta}$ pseudopolymorphs. Given their observed magnetic behaviors, we propose $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}x{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ and $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Ti}{({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4})}_{2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}2{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ as close to ideal model $S=1/2$ Heisenberg square and diamond lattice antiferromagnets, respectively.