Cone‐beam computed tomography versus computed tomography‐guided ultrathin bronchoscopic diagnosis for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A propensity score‐matched analysis
Naoya Kawakita, Hiromitsu Takizawa, Hiroaki Toba, Shinichi Sakamoto, Naoki Miyamoto, Daisuke Matsumoto, Mika Takashima, Mitsuhiro Tsuboi, Mitsuteru Yoshida, Yukikiyo Kawakami, Kazuya Kondo, Akira Tangoku
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: CBCT-guided TBB using a UTB under VBN is a useful method for the diagnosis of peripheral small pulmonary lesions. CBCT-guided TBB using UTB under VBN has been used as an alternative to CT-guided TBB. However, the advantage of CBCT-guided TBB using UTB under VBN over CT-guided TBB is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of CT-guided TBB and CBCT-guided TBB using a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: Patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions ≤30 mm were included. Lesions whose bronchus could not be determined by CT were excluded. A UTB and biopsy forceps were advanced to the target bronchus under VBN, 2D-fluoroscopy and CT or CBCT. The CT-guided and CBCT-guided groups were matched for their propensity scores based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 93 patients in the CT-guided group and 79 patients in the CBCT-guided group for this study. Furthermore, 48 distinct examination pairs were generated by propensity score matching. In the overall diagnostic yield, the CBCT-guided group showed better results (72.9%) than did the CT-guided group (47.9%) (P = 0.012). The median examination time lasted for 43 (IQR: 37-51) min in the CBCT-guided group and 50 (IQR: 43-62) min in the CT-guided group. The examination time in the CBCT-guided group was significantly shorter than that of the CT-guided group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CBCT-guided TBB had a better diagnostic yield and shorter examination time than did CT-guided TBB.