Litcius/Paper detail

Should vegans compromise?

Josh Milburn

2020Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In two recent articles, Marcus William Hunt has posed questions about raising children as vegans. In ‘Parental Compromise’, he argues that pro-vegan-children parents should compromise with anti–vegan-children co-parents, and, in ‘Veganism and Children’, he challenges arguments in favour of vegan parenting. I argue that his pro-compromise position overlooks the idea that respect for animal rights is a duty of justice, and thus not something to be compromised on lightly. To demonstrate the plausibility of this position, I challenge his arguments that Tom Regan’s case for animal rights does not endorse vegan parenting. Nonetheless, I argue that there may be space for pro-vegan-children parents to compromise with anti–vegan-children parents over ‘unusual eating’. This seeks out unusual sources of animal protein that do not involve violations of animals’ rights.

Topics & Concepts

CompromiseAnimal rightsVegan DietDutySociologyPosition (finance)LawEnvironmental ethicsLaw and economicsPsychologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyMedicineEconomicsInternal medicineFinanceAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Should vegans compromise? | Litcius