Outcome of consistent guideline-based tricuspid management in patients undergoing degenerative mitral regurgitation correction
Gilles Dreyfus, Benjamin Essayagh, Giovanni Benfari, Filip Dulguerov, Shelley Rahman Haley, Carine Dommerc, Adelin Albert, Maurice Enriquez‐Sarano
Abstract
Objectives: Despite coherent guidelines, management of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) consequences on outcome in the context of degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) remains controversial due to lacking series of large magnitude with rigorous application of tricuspid guidelines and strict long-term echocardiographic follow-up. Thus, we aimed at gathering such a cohort to examine outcomes of patients undergoing DMR surgery following tricuspid surgery guidelines. Methods: All consecutive patients with isolated DMR 2005-2015 operated on with baseline FTR assessment and tricuspid annulus diameter measurement were identified. Operative complications, postoperative tricuspid regurgitation incidence, and survival were assessed overall and stratified by guideline-based tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) indication (severe FTR or tricuspid annulus diameter ≥40 mm). Results: = .09. for patients with TA versus without. Conclusions: In this large surgical DMR cohort, guideline-based FTR management was safe and effective. While long-term mortality did not reach significance, postoperative incidence of moderate/severe FTR, overall low, was nevertheless greater in patients who did not appear to require TA at surgery and linked to tricuspid annular dimension. Thus, future multicenter prospective cohorts with long-term follow-up are warranted to re-examine thresholds for TA performance and impact on survival.