Litcius/Paper detail

Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine

Christian Ott, Susanne Jung, Manuel Korn, Dennis Kannenkeril, Agnes Bosch, Julie Kolwelter, Kristina Striepe, Peter Bramlage, Mario Schiffer, Roland E. Schmieder

2021Cardiovascular Diabetology26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. Methods Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empagliflozin and linagliptin (E+L group) or metformin and insulin glargine (M+I group) for 3 months. Renal hemodynamics were assessed with para-aminohippuric acid and inulin for renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intraglomerular hemodynamics were calculated according the Gomez´ model. Results Treatment with E+L reduced GFR (p = 0.003), but RPF remained unchanged (p = 0.536). In contrast, M+I not only reduced GFR (p = 0.001), but also resulted in a significant reduction of RPF (p < 0.001). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) decreased with E+L treatment (p = 0.001) but increased with M+I treatment (p = 0.001). The changes in RPF and RVR were different between the two groups (both p adjust < 0.001). Analysis of intraglomerular hemodynamics revealed that E+L did not change resistance of afferent arteriole (R A ) (p = 0.116), but diminished resistance of efferent arterioles (R E ) (p = 0.001). In M+I group R A was increased (p = 0.006) and R E remained unchanged (p = 0.538). The effects on R A (p adjust < 0.05) and on R E (p adjust < 0.05) differed between the groups. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function treatment with M+I resulted in reduction of renal perfusion and increase in vascular resistance, in contrast to treatment with E+I that preserved renal perfusion and reduced vascular resistance. Moreover, different underlying effects on the resistance vessels have been estimated according to the Gomez model, with M+I increasing R A and E+L predominantly decreasing R E , which is in contrast to the proposed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor effects. Trial registration : The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113) on April 26, 2016

Topics & Concepts

MedicineLinagliptinMetforminRenal functionHemodynamicsUrologyInternal medicineEmpagliflozinRenal blood flowType 2 diabetesInsulin resistanceDiabetes mellitusVascular resistanceEndocrinologyDiabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Management and Research
Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine | Litcius