Identification of delirium from real-world electronic health record clinical notes
Jennifer L. St. Sauver, Sunyang Fu, Sunghwan Sohn, Susan A. Weston, Chun‐An Fan, Janet E. Olson, Bjoerg Thorsteinsdottir, Nathan K. LeBrasseur, Sandeep R. Pagali, Walter A. Rocca, Hongfang Liu
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: We tested the ability of our natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify delirium episodes in a large-scale study using real-world clinical notes. Methods: We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify persons ≥ 65 years who were hospitalized between 2011 and 2017. We identified all persons with an International Classification of Diseases code for delirium within ±14 days of a hospitalization. We independently applied our NLP algorithm to all clinical notes for this same population. We calculated rates using number of delirium episodes as the numerator and number of hospitalizations as the denominator. Rates were estimated overall, by demographic characteristics, and by year of episode, and differences were tested using Poisson regression. Results: In total, 14,255 persons had 37,554 hospitalizations between 2011 and 2017. The code-based delirium rate was 3.02 per 100 hospitalizations (95% CI: 2.85, 3.20). The NLP-based rate was 7.36 per 100 (95% CI: 7.09, 7.64). Rates increased with age (both p < 0.0001). Code-based rates were higher in men compared to women ( p = 0.03), but NLP-based rates were similar by sex ( p = 0.89). Code-based rates were similar by race and ethnicity, but NLP-based rates were higher in the White population compared to the Black and Asian populations ( p = 0.001). Both types of rates increased significantly over time (both p values < 0.001). Conclusions: The NLP algorithm identified more delirium episodes compared to the ICD code method. However, NLP may still underestimate delirium cases because of limitations in real-world clinical notes, including incomplete documentation, practice changes over time, and missing clinical notes in some time periods.