Adverse events induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination regimens
Kohei Somekawa, Nobuyuki Horita, Ayami Kaneko, Yoichi Tagami, Nobuhiko Fukuda, Hiromi Matsumoto, Ho Namkoong, Yu Fujiwara, Kaoru Minegishi, Takeshi Fukumoto, Keisuke Watanabe, Yu Hara, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Takeshi Kaneko
Abstract
Background: No meta-analysis has assessed the pooled frequencies of adverse events (AEs) induced by concomitant nivolumab plus ipilimumab regimen for anticancer-medications-naïve malignancies. Furthermore, no meta-analysis has compared detailed safety profiles between four doses of nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks (N3I1) and four doses of nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (N1I3). Objectives of this study was estimating AE frequencies, and comparison of AE frequencies between N3I1 and N1I3 regimens. Methods: Four major electronic databases were searched; both interventional and observational studies were included. All primary cancer types were permitted. Patients should not have been previously treated with any anti-cancer medications. The frequency of AEs was pooled using a random-model meta-analysis using the generic inverse variance method. Protocol registration: UMIN000044090. Results: Forty articles representing 48 populations with 4,677 patients were included in the study. The pooled frequencies for key indicators were as follows: any AE, 81.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.5-85.1); grade 3 or higher AE, 40.6% (95% CI: 35.7–45.5); serious AE, 32.7% (95% CI: 22.4–43.1); AE leading to discontinuation, 28.3% (95% CI: 23.7–32.8); and treatment-related death, 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4–1.1). AEs with the highest incidence were fatigue (27.9%, 95% CI: 22.6–33.3), followed by diarrhea (26.0%, 95% CI: 21.5–30.5), pruritus (24.6%, 95% CI: 20.3–28.8), rash (24.0% 95% CI: 19.3–28.7), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (21.2%, 95% CI: 14.9–27.5). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that N3I1, compared to N1I3, less frequently induced any AE (N1I3 95.7%, N3I1 84.5%, p = 0.003), grade 3 or higher AE (N1I3 64.3%, N3I1 35.7%, p < 0.001), and serious AE (N1I3 61.4%, N3I1 47.8%, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Approximately 40% of patients had grade 3 or higher AE. The N3I1 regimen was substantiated to trigger fewer any AEs, high grade AEs, and serious AE than the N1I3 regimen.