Litcius/Paper detail

Validity of the diagnostic criteria from the Asian Working Group for Cachexia in advanced cancer

Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Keisuke Maeda, Tomoko Takeuchi, Ai Mizuno, Ryoko Kato, Yuria Ishida, Junko Ueshima, Akio Shimizu, Koji Amano, Naoharu Mori

2023Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Background Recently, the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) published a consensus statement on diagnostic criteria for cachexia in Asians. We aimed to validate the criteria in adult patients in Japan with advanced cancer. Methods We conducted a single‐institution retrospective cohort study between April 2021 and October 2022. The AWGC criteria include chronic comorbidities and either a weight loss of >2% over 3–6 months or a body mass index (BMI) of <21 kg/m 2 . In addition, any of the following items were required: anorexia as a subjective symptom, decreased grip strength as an objective measurement and an elevated C‐reactive protein (CRP) level as a biomarker. We used the cut‐off value of grip strength of 28/18 kg for male/female individuals and CRP level of 5 mg/L. Results Of the 449 consecutive patients, 85 of those who could not be evaluated because of end‐of‐life or refractory symptoms ( n = 41) or missing data ( n = 44) were excluded from the primary analysis. The prevalence of the AWGC‐defined cachexia was 76% ( n = 277), and the median survival time (MST) for all patients was 215 (95% confidence interval [CI] 145–270) days. The prevalence of the following criteria was significantly higher in patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia: a BMI of <21 kg/m 2 (65% vs. 15%, P < 0.001), a weight loss of >2% in 6 months (87% vs. 14%, P < 0.001), anorexia (75% vs. 47%, P < 0.001), a grip strength of <28 kg in male individuals (63% vs. 28%, P < 0.001) and CRP level of >5 mg/L (85% vs. 56%, P < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia (MST 157 days, 95% CI 108–226 days vs. MST 423 days, 95% CI 245 days to not available, P = 0.0023). The Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that best supportive care (hazard ratio [HR] 2.91, P ≤ 0.001), lung cancer (HR 1.67, P = 0.0046), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of ≥3 (HR 1.58, P = 0.016), AWGC‐defined cachexia (HR 1.56, P = 0.015), an age of ≥70 years (HR 1.53, P = 0.0070), oedema (HR 1.31, P = 0.022) and head/neck cancer (HR 0.44, P = 0.023) were found to be the significant predictors for mortality. Conclusions We demonstrated that AWGC‐defined cachexia has a significant prognostic value in advanced cancer.

Topics & Concepts

CachexiaMedicineAnorexiaInternal medicineWeight lossGrip strengthConfidence intervalBody mass indexGastroenterologyCohortCancerRetrospective cohort studyRefractory (planetary science)Physical therapyObesityPhysicsAstrobiologyNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrailty in Older Adults
Validity of the diagnostic criteria from the Asian Working Group for Cachexia in advanced cancer | Litcius