A comparative study between LSSVM, LSTM, and ANN in predicting the unconfined compressive strength of virgin fine-grained soil

Abstract

The present investigation introduces a robust soft computing model by comparing twelve least square support vector machine (LSSVM), six long short-term memory (LSTM), and thirty-six artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of fine-grained soil. For that purpose, a database of fine content, dry unit weight, porosity, void ratio, degree of saturation, and specific gravity results of 85 soil specimens has been compiled from the literature. 75 and 10 soil specimens were trained and tested for each model. Six training databases have been prepared to analyze the effect of quality and quantity of training database by selecting 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of 75 soil specimens. The performance comparison demonstrated that the LSTM model (MD 113) requires fewer training datasets (50% of 75) than the LSSVM (MD 102 and MD 108) and ANN (MD 120, MD 127, MD 136, MD139, MD 148, and MD 150) models. Also, it was observed that the nonlinear LSSVM model (MD 108) is unaffected by multicollinearity in training datasets and predicted UCS better than the linear LSSVM model (MD 102). Furthermore, the Levenberg-Marquardt neural network model (MD 120) has outperformed the other ANN models with the root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.1214 N/cm 2 , the mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.1379 N/cm 2 , and correlation (R) of 0.9836. The overall performance comparison revealed that the LSTM model is more potent than the LSSVM and ANN models. The LSTM model predicted the UCS of fine-grained soil with the RMSE of 4.7539 N/cm 2 , the MAE of 4.2461 N/cm 2 , and R of 0.9880. Conversely, cosine amplitude sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the fine content and dry unit weight influence the prediction of virgin UCS of fine-grained soils.

Topics & Concepts