Patient Education for Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review
Danilo de Oliveira Silva, Marcella Ferraz Pazzinatto, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Sinéad Holden, Emily C. Bell, Fábio Mícolis de Azevedo, Christian J. Barton
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of education interventions compared with any type of comparator on managing patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Intervention systematic review. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018088671. LITERATURE SEARCH: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for studies evaluating the effect of education on clinical and functional outcomes in people with PFP. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and quality. We included randomized controlled trials on PFP where at least 1 group received an education intervention (in isolation or in combination with other interventions). DATA SYNTHESIS: Available data were synthesized via meta-analysis where possible; data that were not appropriate for pooling were synthesized qualitatively. Interpretation was guided by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Nine trials were identified. Low-credibility evidence indicated that health education material alone was inferior to exercise therapy for pain and function outcomes. Low- and very low-credibility evidence indicated that health professional-delivered education alone produced outcomes similar to those of exercise therapy combined with health professional-delivered education for pain and function, respectively. CONCLUSION: .