Litcius/Paper detail

Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis need for lead extraction whatever the device according to the ESC EORP EURO-ENDO registry

Erwan Donal, Christophe Tribouilloy, Anita Sadeghpour, Cécile Laroche, Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues, Maria do Carmo Pereira Nunes, Duk‐Hyun Kang, Marta Soraia Lima Menêses, Zhanna Kobalava, Michele De Bonis, Rafał Dworakowski, Branislava Ivanović, Mária Holická, Takeshi Kitai, Ines Cruz, Olivier Huttin, Paolo Colonna, Patrizio Lancellotti, Gilbert Habib

2023European Heart Journal Open26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Aims Cardiac device–related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is a severe complication of cardiac device (CD) implantation and is usually treated by antibiotic therapy and percutaneous device extraction. Few studies report the management and prognosis of CDRIE in real life. In particular, the rate of device extraction in clinical practice and the management of patients with left heart infective endocarditis (LHIE) and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE−) are not well described. Methods and results We sought to study in EURO-ENDO, the characteristics, prognosis, and management of 483 patients with a CD included in the European Society of Cardiology EurObservational Research Programme EURO-ENDO registry. Three populations were compared: 280 isolated CDRIE (66.7 ± 14.3 years), 157 patients with LHIE and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE−) (71.1 ± 13.6), and 46 patients with both LHIE and CDRIE (LHIE+CDRIE+) (70.2 ± 10.1). Echocardiography was not always transoesophageal echography (TOE); it was transthoracic echography (TTE) for isolated CDRIE in 88.4% (TOE = 67.6%), for LHIE+CDRIE− TTE = 93.0% (TOE = 58.6%), and for CDRIE+LHIE+ TTE = 87.0% (TOE = 63.0%). Nuclear imaging was performed in 135 patients (positive for 75.6%). In-hospital mortality was lower in isolated CDRIE 13.2% vs. 22.3% and 30.4% for LHIE+CDRIE− and LHIE+CDRIE+ (P = 0004). Device extraction was performed in 62.1% patients with isolated CDRIE, 10.2% of LHIE+CDRIE− patients, and 45.7% of CDRIE+LHIE+ patients. Device extraction was associated with a better prognosis [hazard ratio 0.59 (0.40–0.87), P = 0.0068] even in the LHIE+CDRIE− group (P = 0.047). Conclusion Prognosis of endocarditis in patients with a CD remains poor, particularly in the presence of an associated LHIE. Although recommended by guidelines, device extraction is not always performed. Device removal was associated with better prognosis, even in the LHIE+CDRIE− group.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineInfective endocarditisEndocarditisPercutaneousComplicationInternal medicineCardiologyHazard ratioSurgeryConfidence intervalInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesMedical Device Sterilization and Disinfection