Litcius/Paper detail

3D free‐breathing cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Gastão Cruz, Olivier Jaubert, Haikun Qi, Aurélien Bustin, Giorgia Milotta, Torben Schneider, Peter Koken, Mariya Doneva, René M. Botnar, Claudia Prieto

2020NMR in Biomedicine56 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Purpose To develop a novel respiratory motion compensated three‐dimensional (3D) cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) approach for whole‐heart myocardial T 1 and T 2 mapping from a free‐breathing scan. Methods Two‐dimensional (2D) cMRF has been recently proposed for simultaneous, co‐registered T 1 and T 2 mapping from a breath‐hold scan; however, coverage is limited. Here we propose a novel respiratory motion compensated 3D cMRF approach for whole‐heart myocardial T 1 and T 2 tissue characterization from a free‐breathing scan. Variable inversion recovery and T 2 preparation modules are used for parametric encoding, respiratory bellows driven localized autofocus is proposed for beat‐to‐beat translation motion correction and a subspace regularized reconstruction is employed to accelerate the scan. The proposed 3D cMRF approach was evaluated in a standardized T 1 / T 2 phantom in comparison with reference spin echo values and in 10 healthy subjects in comparison with standard 2D MOLLI, SASHA and T 2 ‐GraSE mapping techniques at 1.5 T. Results 3D cMRF T 1 and T 2 measurements were generally in good agreement with reference spin echo values in the phantom experiments, with relative errors of 2.9% and 3.8% for T 1 and T 2 ( T 2 < 100 ms), respectively. in vivo left ventricle (LV) myocardial T 1 values were 1054 ± 19 ms for MOLLI, 1146 ± 20 ms for SASHA and 1093 ± 24 ms for the proposed 3D cMRF; corresponding T 2 values were 51.8 ± 1.6 ms for T2‐GraSE and 44.6 ± 2.0 ms for 3D cMRF. LV coefficients of variation were 7.6 ± 1.6% for MOLLI, 12.1 ± 2.7% for SASHA and 5.8 ± 0.8% for 3D cMRF T 1 , and 10.5 ± 1.4% for T2‐GraSE and 11.7 ± 1.6% for 3D cMRF T 2 . Conclusion The proposed 3D cMRF can provide whole‐heart, simultaneous and co‐registered T 1 and T 2 maps with accuracy and precision comparable to those of clinical standards in a single free‐breathing scan of about 7 min.

Topics & Concepts

Imaging phantomNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingVentricleMedicineNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsRadiologyCardiologyAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research