Potentials and Limits of Vegetation Indices With BRDF Signatures for Soil-Noise Resistance and Estimation of Leaf Area Index
Zhijun Zhen, Shengbo Chen, Wenhan Qin, Guangjian Yan, Jean‐Philippe Gastellu‐Etchegorry, Lisai Cao, Mike Murefu, Jian Li, Bingbing Han
Abstract
Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) is found to be undesirable to estimate Leaf Area Index (LAI) with heterogeneous canopy structure in low vegetation cover. In this article, three new vegetation indices (VIs), such as Normalized Hotspot-Signature Vegetation Index 2 (NHVI2), Hotspot-Signature Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (HSVI), and Hotspot-Signature 2-Band Enhanced Vegetation Index (HEVI2), are proposed for a better quantitative estimation of LAI and soil-noise resistance than with SAVI. To obtain these new indices, the angular index called Normalized Difference between Hotspot and Darkspot (NDHD) is introduced which represents the distribution of foliage in vegetation canopy. The validity of new VIs is statistically verified using simulated data and field measurements. The Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model is used to simulate both the homogeneous and heterogeneous canopy for analyzing vegetation isolines behaviors, soil-noise resistance, and LAI estimation. In situ measurements of LAI and bidirectional reflectance factor from the Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) are also used to test the robustness of the new VIs for the estimation of LAI. By considering the distribution of the foliage, the accuracy of LAI estimation of SAVI for heterogeneous canopy improved almost 16% using exponential regression analysis. With the improvement of multiangular remote-sensing and Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) models in the future, hotspot-signature VIs have the potential to provide a more accurate LAI estimation for heterogeneous canopy in strong soil-noise interference area.