Progression of experimental peri‐implantitis in guided bone regeneration and pristine bone: A preclinical in vivo study
Young‐Chang Ko, Jungwon Lee, Dongseob Lee, Yang‐Jo Seol, Ki‐Tae Koo, Yong‐Moo Lee
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is the most widely used technique for overcoming the deficiency of alveolar bone. However, the progression of peri-implantitis in regenerative and pristine bone sites has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to compare experimental peri-implantitis around implants placed in pristine bone and GBR sites. METHODS: Bilateral mandibular first molars were extracted from six beagle dogs, and standardized horizontal ridge defect was simultaneously created at predetermined site in unilateral mandible. After 8 weeks, guided bone regeneration procedure was conducted at the defect site. After 16 weeks, implants (ϕ 3.6×8.0 mm) were placed at both extracted sites. This study included 3 months of active breakdown and another 3 months of spontaneous progression period. Radiographs were taken at each phase and specimens were obtained for histological, immunohistochemical, and polarized light microscopic analysis. RESULTS: Marginal bone loss around implant did not show the significant differences between pristine bone and GBR sites during spontaneous progression period. In immunohistochemical analysis, inflammatory and immune-related cells were predominantly detected in peri-implantitis-affected area rather than unaffected area. In the polarized light microscopic analysis, substantial reductions in the amount and thickness of collagen fibers were observed in peri-implantitis-affected area compared with unaffected tissues. However, there were no significant differences in histological, immunohistochemical, polarized light microscopic outcomes between pristine bone and GBR sites. CONCLUSION: Previous hard tissue grafting at the implant sites did not affect experimental peri-implantitis and exhibited similar radiographic, histological, immunohistochemical, and polarized light microscopic outcomes compared with those of pristine bone sites.