Litcius/Paper detail

Thinking Beyond the “Core” Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions: Shifting the Onus for Appropriate Antibiotic Use from Stewardship Teams to Prescribing Clinicians

Timothy C Jenkins, Pranita D. Tamma

2020Clinical Infectious Diseases24 citationsDOI

Abstract

United States guidance for hospital antibiotic stewardship has emphasized prospective audit and feedback and prior authorization of select antibiotics as core interventions. These remain the most common interventions implemented by stewardship programs. Although these approaches have been shown to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, they incorrectly put the onus for appropriate antibiotic use on the stewardship team rather than the prescribing clinician. We propose that a primary focus of stewardship programs should be implementation of broader interventions that engage frontline clinicians and equip them with tools to integrate antibiotic stewardship into their own daily practice, thus reducing the need for day-to-day stewardship team oversite. We discuss a framework of broader interventions and policies that will facilitate this paradigm shift.

Topics & Concepts

Antimicrobial stewardshipPsychological interventionStewardship (theology)Antibiotic StewardshipMedicineAuditAntibioticsNursingFamily medicineIntensive care medicinePublic relationsBusinessPolitical scienceAntibiotic resistanceAccountingMicrobiologyLawPoliticsBiologyAntibiotic Use and ResistancePatient Satisfaction in HealthcareBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Thinking Beyond the “Core” Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions: Shifting the Onus for Appropriate Antibiotic Use from Stewardship Teams to Prescribing Clinicians | Litcius