Litcius/Paper detail

Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices

Dylan Gomes, Patrice Pottier, Robert Crystal‐Ornelas, Emma J. Hudgins, Vivienne Foroughirad, Luna L. Sánchez‐Reyes, Rachel Turba, Paula Andrea Martinez, David Moreau, Michael G. Bertram, Cooper Smout, Kaitlyn M. Gaynor

2022Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences156 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The biological sciences community is increasingly recognizing the value of open, reproducible and transparent research practices for science and society at large. Despite this recognition, many researchers fail to share their data and code publicly. This pattern may arise from knowledge barriers about how to archive data and code, concerns about its reuse, and misaligned career incentives. Here, we define, categorize and discuss barriers to data and code sharing that are relevant to many research fields. We explore how real and perceived barriers might be overcome or reframed in the light of the benefits relative to costs. By elucidating these barriers and the contexts in which they arise, we can take steps to mitigate them and align our actions with the goals of open science, both as individual scientists and as a scientific community.

Topics & Concepts

Code (set theory)IncentiveOpen scienceData scienceCategorizationData sharingReuseOpen dataValue (mathematics)Computer sciencePublic relationsKnowledge managementInternet privacyBusinessPolitical scienceWorld Wide WebEngineeringAstronomyArtificial intelligenceEconomicsSet (abstract data type)Alternative medicineMachine learningPhysicsPathologyMedicineProgramming languageWaste managementMicroeconomicsResearch Data Management PracticesScientific Computing and Data ManagementEthics in Clinical Research