Substrate Promiscuity and Hyperoxidation Susceptibility as Potential Driving Forces for the Co-evolution of Prx5-Type and Prx6-Type 1-Cys Peroxiredoxin Mechanisms
Lukas Lang, Ann‐Cathrin Wolf, Mareike Riedel, Lea Thibol, Fabian Geissel, Kristina Feld, Jannik Zimmermann, Bruce Morgan, Georg Manolikakes, Marcel Deponte
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide So-called 1-Cys peroxiredoxins (Prx) employ only one cysteine residue for the reduction of hydroperoxides and require an external thiol for the reduction of a reactive sulfenic acid during the catalytic cycle. Hence, 1-Cys Prx, which often belong to the structural Prx5- or the Prx6-type subfamily, are potentially promiscuous enzymes that could react with a variety of thiols. Furthermore, the dependence on an external thiol could affect the susceptibility of 1-Cys Prx to hyperoxidation, i.e., the formation of a sulfinic or sulfonic acid. Here, we compared the reaction mechanisms and kinetics of the Prx5- and Prx6-type enzymes PfAOP and PfPrx6 from the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum to address the hyperoxidation susceptibility and potential substrate promiscuity of 1-Cys Prx. While PfAOP did not react with common thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases, the enzyme turned out to be promiscuous regarding the reduction by synthesized glutathione analogues and other low-molecular-weight thiols. Furthermore, we established a complete single turnover experiment for PfAOP with glutathione and the glutaredoxin PfGrx and identified the rapid H 2 O 2 -dependent hyperoxidation of PfAOP as the cause for the apparent preference of this Prx5-type enzyme for alkylhydroperoxides in vitro . Unlike promiscuous PfAOP, PfPrx6 was inactive with ascorbate, the physiological low-molecular-weight thiols glutathione, cysteine, cysteamine, coenzyme A, and dihydrolipoamide, as well as physiological protein thiols, including PfTrx1, PfGrx, and the resolving cysteine of the Prx1-type enzyme PfPrx1a in potential hetero-oligomers. Reduction of PfPrx6 was only observed with dithiothreitol and required the presence of a histidine residue, which protects the enzyme from hyperoxidation and is the major structural difference between the active sites of Prx5- and Prx6-type enzymes. We propose two alternative evolutionary adaptations of the 1-Cys Prx mechanism to hyperoxidation and the formation of alternative mixed disulfides that could explain the co-existence of promiscuous Prx5- and protected Prx6-type enzymes in a variety of organisms and subcellular compartments.