Litcius/Paper detail

Commissural geometry and cusp fusion insights to guide bicuspid aortic valve repair

Jama Jahanyar, Gébrine El Khoury, Laurent de Kerchove

2021JTCVS Techniques47 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Central MessageWe present our new repair-oriented BAV classification, which better describes the complex 3-dimensional geometry/anatomy of BAV and aims at facilitating surgical repair.See Commentaries on pages 93 and 95. We present our new repair-oriented BAV classification, which better describes the complex 3-dimensional geometry/anatomy of BAV and aims at facilitating surgical repair. See Commentaries on pages 93 and 95. Similar to the mitral valve, surgeons nowadays increasingly attempt to repair a regurgitant aortic valve due to its edge over prosthetic aortic valve replacement with better long-term survival, fewer thromboembolic events, and overall improved quality of life.1de Meester C. Pasquet A. Gerber B.L. Vancraeynest D. Noirhomme P. El Khoury G. et al.Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148: 1913-1920Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar, 2Arabkhani B. Mookhoek A. Di Centa I. Lansac E. Bekkers J.A. De Lind Van Wijngaarden R. et al.Reported outcome after valve-sparing aortic root replacement for aortic root aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100: 1126-1131Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 3Aicher D. Holz A. Feldner S. Kollner V. Schafers H.J. Quality of life after aortic valve surgery: replacement versus reconstruction.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142: e19-e24Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar, 4Mookhoek A. Korteland N.M. Arabkhani B. Di Centa I. Lansac E. Bekkers J.A. et al.Bentall procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101: 1684-1689Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar, 5Wong C.H.M. Chan J.S.K. Sanli D. Rahimli R. Harky A. Aortic valve repair or replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Card Surg. 2019; 34: 377-384Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar, 6Chaliki H.P. Mohty D. Avierinos J.F. Scott C.G. Schaff H.V. Tajik A.J. et al.Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function.Circulation. 2002; 106: 2687-2693Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar This is facilitated by a better understanding of the aortic valve and its functional aortic annulus (FAA), basal ring to sinotubular junction (STJ), in addition to Gebrine el Khoury's application of Alain Carpentier's mitral valve principals to the aortic valve.7El Khoury G. Glineur D. Rubay J. Verhelst R. d'Acoz Yd Poncelet A. et al.Functional classification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005; 20: 115-121Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar Moreover, aortic valve repair also include bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs), but a repair-oriented classification guiding the surgical approach has been lacking. There have been various descriptive classifications in the past, but from a surgeon's point of view, they do not aid in generating a repair strategy.8Sabet H.Y. Edwards W.D. Tazelaar H.D. Daly R.C. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases.Mayo Clin Proc. 1999; 74: 14-26Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar, 9Sievers H.H. Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 133: 1226-1233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (650) Google Scholar, 10Schaefer B.M. Lewin M.B. Stout K.K. Gill E. Prueitt A. Byers P.H. et al.The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape.Heart. 2008; 94: 1634-1638Crossref PubMed Scopus (310) Google Scholar, 11Kang J.W. Song H.G. Yang D.H. Baek S. Kim D.H. Song J.M. et al.Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6: 150-161Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar These classifications are too simplistic, only focusing on patterns of cusp fusion and the presence or absence of a raphe (nonfunctional commissure). They do not capture the true 3-dimensional anatomy and variability of the BAV. Nonetheless, our insights into valve phenotypes have evolved, and we now understand that commissural orientation (CO) in BAVs is critical in determining the correct repair strategy, and perhaps also influences outcomes after BAV repair.12Aicher D. Kunihara T. Abou Issa O. Brittner B. Graber S. Schafers H.J. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve.Circulation. 2011; 123: 178-185Crossref PubMed Scopus (240) Google Scholar,13de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Froede L. Tamer S. Boodhwani M. van Dyck M. et al.Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 351-359Crossref Scopus (50) Google Scholar Other elements, which also factor into decision making, are length of cusp fusion, height of the nonfunctional commissure (raphe), as well as quality/quantity of cusp tissues and annular dilatation.12Aicher D. Kunihara T. Abou Issa O. Brittner B. Graber S. Schafers H.J. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve.Circulation. 2011; 123: 178-185Crossref PubMed Scopus (240) Google Scholar, 13de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Froede L. Tamer S. Boodhwani M. van Dyck M. et al.Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 351-359Crossref Scopus (50) Google Scholar, 14Schafers H.J. Schmied W. Marom G. Aicher D. Cusp height in aortic valves.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 146: 269-274Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (107) Google Scholar, 15Schneider U. Feldner S.K. Hofmann C. Schöpe J. Wagenpfeil S. Giebels C. et al.Two decades of experience with root remodeling and valve repair for bicuspid aortic valves.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: S65-S71Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 16Schneider U. Hofmann C. Aicher D. Takahashi H. Miura Y. Schafers H.J. Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: 504-510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar In a recent study analyzing BAV anatomy in a large cohort of patients who underwent valve preservation and repair, we observed that BAV phenotypes follow a continuous spectrum, with the CO and thus angulation of leaflet coaptation area, ranging from 120° to 180° (Figure 1).13de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Froede L. Tamer S. Boodhwani M. van Dyck M. et al.Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 351-359Crossref Scopus (50) Google Scholar For the purpose of repair, we divide this wide spectrum into 3 different phenotypes (Table 1). The most symmetric valves range from 160° to 180°, asymmetric valves from 140° to 159°, and very asymmetric valves from 120° to 139° (Figure 2). The pattern of cusp fusion (right/left in 83%, right/non in 15%, and non/left in 2%) was similarly distributed amongst the 3 phenotype groups. Aortic dilatation (≥45 mm) was present in 47% of symmetric, 37% of asymmetric, and 39% of very asymmetric phenotypes.Table 1BAV phenotypes, anatomy, pathophysiology, and surgical approachBAV phenotypeCommissural orientationRaphe heightCusp fusionProlapseRepairTrue symmetric180°NoneCompleteNone∗In case of root aneurysm without AR, the valve phenotype is generally a true BAV., 1, or 2 cuspsCusp plication(s), 180° repairSymmetric160°-180°Close to BRLong fusionFused cuspCusp plication, 180° repairAsymmetric140°-159°Below STJShort fusionFused cuspRaphe thinning, direct raphe closure, 180° repairVery asymmetric120°-139°Close to STJVery short fusionFused cuspTailored approach Fruste120°-139°At STJVery short fusionFused cuspCommissurotomy, commissure resuspension, commissure reconstruction with patch Fenestrated/Chordal raphe120°-139°Close to or at STJShort fusionFused cuspCord resection, direct raphe closure, 180° repairBAV, Bicuspid aortic valve; BR, basal ring; STJ, sinotubular junction.∗ In case of root aneurysm without AR, the valve phenotype is generally a true BAV. Open table in a new tab Figure 2Repair-oriented classification of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) phenotypes. Upper panel, Raphe height. Middle panel, Respective commissural orientation and raphe fusion. Lower panel, Surgical view of native valve.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload (PPT) BAV, Bicuspid aortic valve; BR, basal ring; STJ, sinotubular junction. The aortic annulus in BAV tends to be larger than in trileaflet aortic valves (TAVs), especially in BAV with aortic regurgitation (AR), where it reaches a diameter of 30 mm on average.17Al-Atassi T. Hynes M. Sohmer B. Lam B.K. Mesana T. Boodhwani M. Aortic root geometry in bicuspid aortic insufficiency versus stenosis: implications for valve repair.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 47: e151-e154Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar,18Lansac E. Di Centa I. Sleilaty G. Lejeune S. Berrebi A. Zacek P. et al.Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1033-1042Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar Here, it is important to note that the cause of annular dilatation in BAV is mainly secondary to dilation of the anterior septal and thus muscular portion of the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ), rather than the posterior fibrous portion of the VAJ. The nonfused cusp in BAV, generally has a higher geometric height compared with the fused cusps, and hence carries most of the available leaflet tissues.13de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Froede L. Tamer S. Boodhwani M. van Dyck M. et al.Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 351-359Crossref Scopus (50) Google Scholar,19Tamer S. Mastrobuoni S. van Dyck M. Navarra E. Bollen X. Poncelet A. et al.Free margin length and geometric height in aortic root dilatation and leaflet prolapse: implications for aortic valve repair surgery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 57: 124-132Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar Moreover, it also tends to be the most pliable and mobile, and thus least restrictive cusp in BAV. Accordingly, during repair the nonfused cusp can be utilized to cover more of the aortic orifice if the fused cusp is small, in analogy to the anterior leaflet during mitral valve repair. The cause of regurgitation tends to be the same in all 3 phenotypes. There always appears to be a prolapse of the fused cusps, which in general is more pronounced in the right component of the fused cusp, in asymmetric and very asymmetric phenotypes (in right/left-fusion). A bileaflet prolapse can also occur and is mostly prevalent in the symmetric phenotype. The geometric height of cusps in the symmetric phenotype is also larger, and thereby provides more favorable leaflet tissues for valve repair. Thus, in BAV with AR the mechanism for regurgitation is almost always a prolapse of the fused cusp, with varying degrees of fibrous and calcific degeneration, and an associated annulus dilatation. The nonfused cusps are generally normal and are rarely prolapsing, except in symmetric BAV, or after valve-sparing root replacement for root aneurysm, hence iatrogenic. Via pre- and intraoperative echocardiography, general parameters are established, such as the diameters of the aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva, STJ, and ascending aorta, as well as the The CO is the on the of the nonfused cusp between 2 the of the aortic root and the 3 and In the CO is on short view in L. Schafers S. Wagenpfeil G. A. Schafers H.J. of commissural orientation in bicuspid aortic J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; PubMed Scopus Google panel, of commissural orientation on short in view from the Lower panel, Respective surgical view from the valve.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload (PPT) the determines the pattern of cusp fusion and geometric height of the cusps, and length of raphe fusion. In the height of is to be in true bicuspid valves the height of the nonfunctional commissure is the spectrum of BAV phenotypes, the height of the raphe but always appears than the height of the functional except in BAV (Table 1).13de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Froede L. Tamer S. Boodhwani M. van Dyck M. et al.Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 351-359Crossref Scopus (50) Google E. or bicuspid aortic valves with very the of bicuspid valve and its be J Cardiol. 2015; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar of the an height of the raphe and a of fusion between cusps is in symmetric BAVs we the with a of fusion between cusps and a raphe to the of the fused Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Froede L. Tamer S. Boodhwani M. van Dyck M. et al.Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 351-359Crossref Scopus (50) Google Scholar These are important and our surgical The for a regurgitant BAV are to correct a fused cusp prolapse its and to the repair. cusp can and a prolapse in symmetric BAV, this of and direct be utilized in asymmetric phenotypes without the cusp and the at for is also not a to a fused cusp prolapse in asymmetric D. Kunihara T. Abou Issa O. Brittner B. Graber S. Schafers H.J. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve.Circulation. 2011; 123: 178-185Crossref PubMed Scopus (240) Google M. Kerchove L. Glineur D. Rubay J. Noirhomme P. et of regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves: a systematic Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar the of tissues in asymmetric BAV, valve is the the at 180° in asymmetric BAV the of the aortic valve orifice by the fused cusp, and in the by the more nonfused The of fused cusp to or direct and cusp with on the Moreover, the of the annulus and root with annuloplasty and root replacement to on the of the fused the 2 decades or to repair a BAV, the general BAV has been sinus and valve-sparing or remodeling E. Kerchove L. Aortic valve repair of the J Cardiothorac Surg. PubMed Scopus Google U. Schmied W. Aicher D. Giebels C. L. Schafers H.J. to valve configuration in bicuspid aortic valve Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar that a large aortic annulus was a of repair and that the annuloplasty was to a BAV Kerchove L. Boodhwani M. Glineur D. M. Noirhomme P. et al.Valve replacement with the to the durability of bicuspid aortic valve Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google T. Aicher D. S. H.V. et aortic root geometry and cusp configuration long-term outcome after aortic root Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar annuloplasty such as the external the and the These in of BAV U. Hofmann C. Aicher D. Takahashi H. Miura Y. Schafers H.J. Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: 504-510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Kerchove L. Boodhwani M. Glineur D. M. Noirhomme P. et al.Valve replacement with the to the durability of bicuspid aortic valve Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google E. Di Centa I. Sleilaty G. Lejeune S. Berrebi A. et results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar the external ring annuloplasty and external root (Figure the left and right ventricular Khoury This for the ring or to be of the and at the of the basal our we have a surgical experience of more than aortic valve In of cases BAV For more than a we have increasingly utilized the to repair most BAV with severe AR or without root This by to aortic root with normal or normal anatomy, can also a BAV with all the present in BAV such as the valve the large annulus, and the For the of BAV repair, we have the into we the 180° Khoury G. Tamer S. Mastrobuoni S. El Khoury G. Kerchove L. Valve root of the aortic Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar In the 180° we the BAV geometry into a symmetric configuration with CO of This the basal ring; the valve symmetric symmetric sinus and cusp geometric height as well as bileaflet and a symmetric Thus, and the at This root from to STJ, in valve repair and leaflet 180° has been G. Tamer S. Mastrobuoni S. El Khoury G. Kerchove L. Valve root of the aortic Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar 1). after external root to the of the basal a of are the basal ring; except for the the where the cusp to system We at and an additional the fused cusp, and the nonfused The are through the of a in a that for of the of commissure at 180° (Figure This also cusp and in of the The of the has been by the length of between basal ring and of non/left The of on the to at the of the through of the annulus the fused cusp compared with the annulus the nonfused The are at 180° at the of the of the A as as commissure also a cusp The have to be to which also on the in the as well as the of raphe fusion and the raphe at the of the of the fused cusp, to of asymmetric of the basal ring and 180° commissural the portion of the raphe can be and without the for cusp with patch the same this also of the fused The is by the cusp geometry and are and an of coaptation is with over The symmetric phenotype has the most favorable and in our experience of BAV with The valve is symmetric, with a wide commissural The cusps are in and and cusp fusion is or Moreover, the raphe on the and to the basal The of the repair is to correct the fused cusp prolapse by These valves do not commissural their are 180° or to The is or 180°, the El Khoury (Figure This phenotype of BAV with the of the CO the increasingly of the fused cusp a of fusion and higher with a higher point and of the fused cusp Thus, the raphe fusion is and its on to the aortic is the basal ring but the the repair is to correct the fused cusp by direct of the portion of the direct closure, cusp the valve has to be symmetric with the 180° In this the raphe is from the to the of cusp not to the leaflet The portion of the raphe to cusp at the point of the where a new be the aortic is to the with a the raphe of the fused cusp is to the of the basal which a new of the fused This is to a and symmetric height of the fused and nonfused cusp The annuloplasty and the new valve configuration of 180°, the fused cusp and for of the portion of the raphe (Figure This the geometric height of the fused cusp and the prolapse by length of the of fused and nonfused cusps, with an height of This phenotype of BAV with The valve is very asymmetric with a commissural The cusps are very different in and and the raphe fusion is short and its on the aortic is and to the of the This is the most anatomy, and the repair on the morphology of the fused We 2 is in a as the asymmetric the is a The BAV, also as BAV is to a (Figure These valves generally annular dilatation and do not of their we are to a valve of an external ring severe dilatation mm) or a annuloplasty at the of the 3 dilatation The fused cusp repair can also the raphe fusion is very short and reaches to the of the the can of with or without cusp and of the cusp the right (Figure A and the raphe is short but not the of the STJ, a commissure can be (Figure and The of the raphe are to the aortic at the of the to a functional in addition to a In the raphe not the and the fusion is and The of the commissure to be with a which the leaflet to the of the commissure (Figure and of very asymmetric BAV are the or raphe These valves on echocardiography, and regurgitation to from a right cusp These BAV are by a a or that the edge of the raphe to the this it severe prolapse of the The valves are generally by the (Figure In this the raphe fusion is than for this valve and the valve is an asymmetric BAV with direct of the portion of the raphe and annuloplasty or external A leaflet in and of not a to valve they are small, and do not to the mechanism of AR, they are left Large which are but to the mechanism of AR, can be with a patch to the the is valve replacement be the can be a patch or at the of the 2). leaflet which leaflet and generally cusp This in which also improves an In the past, we to raphe nowadays we to and or the portion of the thereby also the fused cusp prolapse In cases where is leaflet such as in aortic aneurysm without AR, we the raphe to better leaflet without the leaflet which are not can be to not the or are repair, and a valve In BAV with AR, the for AR is almost a prolapse of the fused The of BAV repair is to a valve with a coaptation height of mm with of are a valve without a can be understand to repair a BAV, it is important to that are different phenotypes that different is also important to understand that to a repair, the not only has to the but also the aortic Moreover, the of BAVs are by of the and valve it is important to at a valve is This can be by symmetric and a symmetric to this is our 180° The of The and to of and to or for which they have a of The and of this have of with aortic valve phenotype. 180° available with aortic valve phenotype. 180° available with aortic valve asymmetric phenotype. patch repair, raphe and external ring available with aortic valve asymmetric phenotype. patch repair, raphe and external ring available with aortic valve phenotype. 180° available with aortic valve phenotype. 180° available valve-sparing aortic root replacement is the most approach to aortic valve of the aortic valve has been for 3 and experience that and are to outcomes and aortic valve for than the of the for the or we that to of this is to a and aortic valve This describes the as we it be on a experience with cases and the outcomes in a large cohort of patients during the 3 PDF Open repair in bicuspid and aortic regurgitation is of the most prevalent valvular to of the The of AR is on the of the and the dysfunction of the aortic valvular AR can be into with normal cusp but functional aortic annulus or cusp with cusp prolapse due to cusp or commissural or with cusp in bicuspid aortic valve or valvular PDF Open external and valve repair and root replacement have into increasingly the for an annuloplasty has more at least for that annular dilatation. understand the of an aortic it is to the of aortic valve and root the functional annulus is as the basal of the cusp The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve at least in PDF Open of aortic valve as with is a point to which can and and it is with aortic valve are important to the the of leaflet to leaflet the to in the diameter of an orifice to large by to the the the the of and over a at the and the of leaflet or are with of to edge (5) leaflet height the of without orifice and is and of with that are too with PDF Open

Topics & Concepts

Bicuspid aortic valveCusp (singularity)CommissureAnatomyGeologyGeometryAortic valveMedicineCardiologyMathematicsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Commissural geometry and cusp fusion insights to guide bicuspid aortic valve repair | Litcius