Nobody’s Perfect: Choice of the Buffer and the Rate of Cu<sup>2+</sup> Ion–Peptide Interaction
Radosław Kotuniak, Dobromiła Sudzik, Iwona Ufnalska, Wojciech Bal
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The choice of correct pH buffer is crucial in chemical studies modeling biological processes involving Cu 2+ ions. Popular buffers for physiological pH are known to form Cu(II) complexes, but their impact on kinetics of Cu(II) complexation has not been considered. We performed a stopped-flow kinetic study of Cu 2+ ion interactions with four popular buffers (phosphate, Tris, HEPES, and MOPS) and two buffers considered as nonbinding (MES and PIPPS). Next, we studied their effects on the rate of Cu 2+ reaction with Gly-Gly-His (GGH), a tripeptide modeling physiological Cu(II) sites, which we studied previously at conditions presumably excluding the buffer interference [ Kotuniak, R.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 11234–11239]. We observed that (i) all tested pH 7.4 buffers formed Cu(II) complexes within the stopped-flow instrument dead time; (ii) Cu(II)-peptide complexes were formed via ternary complexes with the buffers; (iii) nevertheless, Good buffers affected the observed rate of Cu(II)-GGH complex formation only slightly; (iv) Tris was a competitive inhibitor of Cu(II)-GGH complexation; while (v) phosphate was a reaction catalyst. This is particularly important as phosphate is a biological buffer.