Litcius/Paper detail

Caffeine for apnea and prevention of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis

Elizabeth A. Oliphant, Sara M. Hanning, Christopher J. D. McKinlay, Jane M. Alsweiler

2024Journal of Perinatology26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the evidence for dose and effectiveness of caffeine in preterm infants. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, CENTRAL, and trial databases were searched to July 2022 for trials randomizing preterm infants to caffeine vs. placebo/no treatment, or low (≤10 mg·kg −1 ) vs. high dose (>10 mg·kg −1 caffeine citrate equivalent). Two researchers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using RoB; GRADE evaluation was completed by all authors. Meta-analysis of 15 studies (3530 infants) was performed in REVMAN across four epochs: neonatal/infant (birth-1 year), early childhood (1–5 years), middle childhood (6–11 years) and adolescence (12–19 years). Caffeine reduced apnea (RR 0.59; 95%CI 0.46,0.75; very low certainty) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (0.77; 0.69,0.86; moderate certainty), with higher doses more effective. Caffeine had no effect on neurocognitive impairment in early childhood but possible benefit on motor function in middle childhood (0.72; 0.57,0.91; moderate certainty). The optimal dose remains unknown; further long-term studies, are needed.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMeta-analysisBronchopulmonary dysplasiaApnea of prematurityPlaceboCaffeineApneaPediatricsRandomized controlled trialNeurocognitiveCochrane LibraryMEDLINEAnesthesiaGestational agePregnancyInternal medicineCognitionPsychiatryPathologyBiologyPolitical scienceGeneticsLawAlternative medicineNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchInfant Development and Preterm CareNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Caffeine for apnea and prevention of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis | Litcius