Litcius/Paper detail

People May Punish, Not Blame, Robots

Minha Lee, Peter A. M. Ruijten, Lily Frank, Yvonne de Kort, Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn

202126 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

As robots may take a greater part in our moral decision-making processes, whether people hold them accountable for moral harm becomes critical to explore. Blame and punishment signify moral accountability, often involving emotions. We quantitatively looked into people’s willingness to blame or punish an emotional vs. non-emotional robot that admits to its wrongdoing. Studies 1 and 2 (online video interaction) showed that people may punish a robot due to its lack of perceived emotional capacity than its perceived agency. Study 3 (in the lab) demonstrated that people were neither willing to blame nor punish the robot. Punishing non-emotional robots seems more likely than blaming them, yet punishment towards robots is more likely to arise online than offline. We reflect on if and why victimized humans (and those who care for them) may seek out retributive justice against robot scapegoats when there are no humans to hold accountable for moral harm.

Topics & Concepts

BlameHarmPunishment (psychology)WrongdoingMoral agencySocial psychologyPsychologyAccountabilityAgency (philosophy)Economic JusticeRobotCriminologySociologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceLawSocial sciencePsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics and Social Impacts of AIDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion