Measuring Council Health to Transform Shared Governance Processes and Practice
R. Hess, Jennifer Bonamer, Diana Swihart, Stacey Brull
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a valid, reliable instrument to measure the effectiveness of shared governance councils BACKGROUND: The work of shared governance, that is, the decisions, takes place in its structures, notably, the councils. A literature search yielded no formal instrument for evaluating how these councils function. METHODS: A 4-phase process was used to generate valid items to measure shared governance council effectiveness, including content validity by experts, a pilot for feasibility, a larger pilot for internal consistency, and an exploratory factor analysis to delineate a final instrument. RESULTS: More than a dozen experts and participants from nearly 30 healthcare organizations contributed to the final development of the 25-item Council Health Survey instrument. Items for measuring council effectiveness at either the unit or division level were grouped in areas of structure, activities, and membership. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating shared governance, nurses should focus on councils themselves, in which much of the work of shared governance occurs.