5‐Year outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Focus on paravalvular leakage assessed by echocardiography and hemodynamic parameters
Simon Schoechlin, Manuel Hein, Tim Brennemann, Martin Eichenlaub, U Schulz, Nikolaus Jander, Franz‐Josef Neumann
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the impact of echocardiographic and hemodynamic grading of paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on the prediction of 5-year mortality. PVL after TAVI is known to influence outcome after TAVI. Yet, present available data of long-term outcomes and especially the comparison of different modalities for measurement of PVL is little. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study and compared the prognostic value of echocardiographic PVL grading as well as the aortic regurgitation index (ARI) pre- and post-TAVI. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis generated hazard ratios for mortality. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients underwent TAVI at our center between August 2012 and Decemebr 2014, with self-expandable CoreValve (11%) or balloon-expandable Sapien XT (47.4%) and Sapien 3 (41.6) valves. Overall 5-year mortality was 52.4% (243/464). Echocardiographic classes of PVL at discharge showed a significant (p = 0.002) association with 5-year mortality, mild PVL remained as an independent predictor for 5-year mortality in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 1.642 [95% confidence interval: 1.235-2.182]; p = 0.001). Grades of PVL as assessed during the procedure by ARI (below the previously defined cut-off of 25) did not show a significant association with 5-year mortality (p = 0.417 and p = 0.995, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Even mild PVL assessed by echocardiography was an independent predictor for 5-year survival, whereas hemodynamic measurements did not help to identify PVLs that are relevant to 5-year survival.