Comparison of S-Detect and thyroid imaging reporting and data system classifications in the diagnosis of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules
Ling Zhou, Linlin Zheng, Chuan-ju Zhang, Hong-fen Wei, Li-long Xu, Mu-rui Zhang, Qiang Li, Gao-fei He, Edem Prince Ghamor-Amegavi, Shiyan Li
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the value of S-Detect for predicting the malignant risk of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (CITNs). Methods The preoperative prediction of 159 CITNs (Bethesda III, IV and V) were performed using S-Detect, Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System of American College of Radiology (ACR TI-RADS) and Chinese TI-RADS (C-TIRADS). First, Linear-by-Linear Association test and chi-square test were used to analyze the malignant risk of CITNs. McNemar’s test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of S-Detect and the two TI-RADS classifications for CITNs. In addition, the McNemar’s test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the above three methods for different pathological types of nodules. Results The maximum diameter of the benign nodules was significantly larger than that of malignant nodules [0.88(0.57-1.42) vs 0.57(0.46-0.81), P =0.002]. The risk of malignant CITNs in Bethesda system and the two TI-RADS classifications increased with grade (all P for trend<0.001). In all the enrolled CITNs, the diagnostic results of S-Detect were significantly different from those of ACR TI-RADS and C-TIRADS, respectively ( P =0.021 and P =0.007). The sensitivity and accuracy of S-Detect [95.9%(90.1%-98.5%) and 88.1%(81.7%-92.5%)] were higher than those of ACR TI-RADS [87.6%(80.1%-92.7%) and 81.8%(74.7%-87.3%)] ( P =0.006 and P =0.021) and C-TIRADS [84.3%(76.3%-90.0%) and 78.6%(71.3%-84.5%)] ( P =0.001 and P =0.001). Moreover, the negative predictive value and the area under curve value of S-Detect [82.8% (63.5%-93.5%) and 0.795%(0.724%-0.855%)] was higher than that of C-TIRADS [54.8%(38.8%-69.8%) and 0.724%(0.648%-0.792%] ( P =0.024 and P =0.035). However, the specificity and positive predictive value of S-Detect were similar to those of ACR TI-RADS ( P =1.000 and P =0.154) and C-TIRADS ( P =1.000 and P =0.072). There was no significant difference in all the evaluated indicators between ACR TI-RADS and C-TIRADS (all P >0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect (97.4%) for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) was higher than that of ACR TI-RADS (90.4%) and C-TIRADS (87.8%) ( P =0.021 and P =0.003). Conclusion The diagnostic performance of S-Detect in differentiating CITNs was similar to ACR TI-RADS and superior to C-TIRADS, especially for PTC.