Litcius/Paper detail

Large-scale interactions in predictive processing: oscillatory versus transient dynamics

Martin Vinck, Cem Uran, Jarrod Robert Dowdall, Brian Rummell, Andrés Canales‐Johnson

2024Trends in Cognitive Sciences37 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

How do the two main types of neural dynamics, aperiodic transients and oscillations, contribute to the interactions between feedforward (FF) and feedback (FB) pathways in sensory inference and predictive processing? We discuss three theoretical perspectives. First, we critically evaluate the theory that gamma and alpha/beta rhythms play a role in classic hierarchical predictive coding (HPC) by mediating FF and FB communication, respectively. Second, we outline an alternative functional model in which rapid sensory inference is mediated by aperiodic transients, whereas oscillations contribute to the stabilization of neural representations over time and plasticity processes. Third, we propose that the strong dependence of oscillations on predictability can be explained based on a biologically plausible alternative to classic HPC, namely dendritic HPC.

Topics & Concepts

PsychologyTransient (computer programming)Scale (ratio)Dynamics (music)Cognitive psychologyNeuroscienceCognitive scienceComputer sciencePhysicsOperating systemPedagogyQuantum mechanicsNeural dynamics and brain functionstochastic dynamics and bifurcationAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Large-scale interactions in predictive processing: oscillatory versus transient dynamics | Litcius