Anode Catalysts in Anion‐Exchange‐Membrane Electrolysis without Supporting Electrolyte: Conductivity, Dynamics, and Ionomer Degradation
Raina A. Krivina, Grace Lindquist, Sarah R. Beaudoin, T. Nathan Stovall, Willow L. Thompson, Liam Twight, Douglas Marsh, Joseph Grzyb, Kevin Fabrizio, James E. Hutchison, Shannon W. Boettcher
Abstract
Abstract Anion‐exchange‐membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) in principle operate without soluble electrolyte using earth‐abundant catalysts and cell materials and thus lower the cost of green H 2 . Current systems lack competitive performance and the durability needed for commercialization. One critical issue is a poor understanding of catalyst‐specific degradation processes in the electrolyzer. While non‐platinum‐group‐metal (non‐PGM) oxygen‐evolution catalysts show excellent performance and durability in strongly alkaline electrolyte, this has not transferred directly to pure‐water AEMWEs. Here, AEMWEs with five non‐PGM anode catalysts are built and the catalysts’ structural stability and interactions with the alkaline ionomer are characterized during electrolyzer operation and post‐mortem. The results show catalyst electrical conductivity is one key to obtaining high‐performing systems and that many non‐PGM catalysts restructure during operation. Dynamic Fe sites correlate with enhanced degradation rates, as does the addition of soluble Fe impurities. In contrast, electronically conductive Co 3 O 4 nanoparticles (without Fe in the crystal structure) yield AEMWEs from simple, standard preparation methods, with performance and stability comparable to IrO 2 . These results reveal the fundamental dynamic catalytic processes resulting in AEMWE device failure under relevant conditions, demonstrate a viable non‐PGM catalyst for AEMWE operation, and illustrate underlying design rules for engineering anode catalyst/ionomer layers with higher performance and durability.