Litcius/Paper detail

Comments on “An Ultrawideband Ultrathin Metamaterial Absorber Based on Circular Split Rings”

Fahad Ahmed, Tayyab Hassan, Nosherwan Shoaib

2020IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters35 citationsDOI

Abstract

This letter provides correction comments to an article published in 2015, by Ghosh <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">et al.</i> in which the authors have proposed a circular-split-rings-based ultrawideband ultrathin metamaterial absorber and claimed 90% absorption between 7.85 to 12.25 GHz. It is found that the authors have misinterpreted a cross polarizer as a broadband absorber by neglecting its cross-polarized reflection. It is found that by incorporating the cross-polarized coefficient of the reflected wave, the absorption of the proposed structure gets below 20% over the complete claimed operating band. Additionally, the polarization conversion ratio is above 90%, which proves that the proposed structure is predominantly a cross polarizer rather than an efficient absorber.

Topics & Concepts

PolarizerMetamaterialBroadbandMetamaterial absorberPhysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsReflection coefficientAbsorption (acoustics)Circular polarizationOptoelectronicsTunable metamaterialsChemistryMicrostripBirefringencePhysical chemistryMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsAntenna Design and AnalysisAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Comments on “An Ultrawideband Ultrathin Metamaterial Absorber Based on Circular Split Rings” | Litcius