Prevalence of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria and Prognostic Value of a Simplified Definition
Katsuya Miura, Takenobu Shimada, Masanobu Ohya, Ryosuke Murai, Hidewo Amano, Shunsuke Kubo, Takeshi Tada, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Yasushi Fuku, Tsuyoshi Goto, Kazushige Kadota
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria have been suggested as the standard definition of HBR. However, the prevalence of individual criteria and their prognostic value for long-term bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention are scarcely studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 1,193 patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents between 2010 and 2011. Data on all 17 major and minor criteria of the ARC-HBR definition were retrospectively collected, and applied to this study population. Major bleeding was defined as the occurrence of a BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding event. A simplified definition was developed by excluding the low-frequency criterion, and the prognostic value was assessed by a receiver-operating characteristic curve. Mean follow-up was 2,996±433 days and there were 656 HBR patients (55.0%). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (16.2% vs. 5.7% at 8 years, P<0.001). The frequencies of 6 of the 17 criteria were less than 1%. The prognostic value of the simplified definition made by excluding these 6 criteria for major bleeding was comparable to that of the original (c-statistic=0.598 and 0.600, P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Some risk criteria of the ARC-HBR definition are observed infrequently. Our simplified definition identified patients with long-term bleeding risk as successfully as the original definition.