Litcius/Paper detail

Why the moral equality account of the hypocrite’s lack of standing to blame fails

Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen

2020Analysis63 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract It is commonly believed that blamees can dismiss hypocritical blame on the ground that the hypocrite has no standing to blame their target. Many believe that the feature of hypocritical blame that undermines standing to blame is that it involves an implicit denial of the moral equality of persons. After all, the hypocrite treats herself better than her blamee for no good reason. In the light of the complement to hypocrites and a comparison of hypocritical and non-hypocritical blamers subscribing to hierarchical moral norms, I show why we must reject the moral equality account of the hypocrite’s lack of standing to blame.

Topics & Concepts

BlameDenialPsychologyComplement (music)Social psychologyPsychoanalysisChemistryBiochemistryPhenotypeComplementationGenePsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentFree Will and AgencyWar, Ethics, and Justification
Why the moral equality account of the hypocrite’s lack of standing to blame fails | Litcius