Litcius/Paper detail

Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units—the SAFE-ICU study

Jason A. Roberts, Fekade B. Sime, Jeffrey Lipman, María Patricia Hernández-Mitre, João Pedro Baptista, Roger J. M. Brüggemann, Jai N. Darvall, Jan J. De Waele, George Dimοpoulos, Jean‐Yves Lefrant, Mohd Basri Mat Nor, Jordi Rello, Leonardo Seoane, Monica A. Slavin, Miia Valkonen, Mario Venditti, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Wai Tat Wong, Markus Zeitlinger, Claire Roger

2025Intensive Care Medicine33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: Appropriate antifungal therapy is a major determinant of survival in critically ill patients with invasive fungal disease. We sought to describe whether contemporary dosing of antifungals achieves therapeutic exposures in critically ill patients. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, multicenter pharmacokinetic study, intensive care unit (ICU) patients prescribed azoles, echinocandins, or polyene antifungals for treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on two occasions, with three samples taken during a single dosing interval on each occasion. Total concentrations were centrally measured using validated chromatographic methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Antifungal dosing adequacy was assessed using predefined PK/PD targets. RESULTS: We included 339 patients from 30 ICUs across 12 countries. Median age 62 (interquartile range [IQR], 51-70) years, median APACHE II score 22 (IQR, 17-28), and 61% males. Antifungal therapy was primarily prescribed for treatment (80.8%). Fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal (40.7%). The most common indication for treatment was intra-abdominal infection (30.7%). Fungi were identified in 45% of patients, of which only 26% had a minimum inhibitory concentration available. Target attainment was higher for patients receiving prophylaxis (> 80% for most drugs). For patients receiving treatment, low target attainment was noted for voriconazole (57.1%), posaconazole (63.2%), micafungin (64.1%) and amphotericin B (41.7%). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the varying degrees of target attainment across antifungal agents in critically ill patients. While a significant proportion of patients achieved the predefined PK/PD targets, wide variability and subtherapeutic exposures persist. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03136926, 2017-04-21.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCritically illAntifungalAnesthesiologyIntensive care medicineIntensive careAntifungal drugsIntensive care unitPain medicinePharmacokineticsMulticenter studyEmergency medicineAnesthesiaPharmacologyInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialDermatologyAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesNail Diseases and Treatments
Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units—the SAFE-ICU study | Litcius