Litcius/Paper detail

Annotation and initial evaluation of a large annotated German oncological corpus

Madeleine Kittner, Mario Lamping, Damian Rieke, Julian Götze, Bariya Bajwa, Ivan Jelas, Gina Rüter, Hanjo Hautow, Mario Sänger, Maryam Habibi, Marit Zettwitz, Till de Bortoli, Leonie Ostermann, Jurica Ševa, Johannes Starlinger, Oliver Kohlbacher, Nisar P. Malek, Ulrich Keilholz, Ulf Leser

2021JAMIA Open41 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present the Berlin-Tübingen-Oncology corpus (BRONCO), a large and freely available corpus of shuffled sentences from German oncological discharge summaries annotated with diagnosis, treatments, medications, and further attributes including negation and speculation. The aim of BRONCO is to foster reproducible and openly available research on Information Extraction from German medical texts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BRONCO consists of 200 manually deidentified discharge summaries of cancer patients. Annotation followed a structured and quality-controlled process involving 2 groups of medical experts to ensure consistency, comprehensiveness, and high quality of annotations. We present results of several state-of-the-art techniques for different IE tasks as baselines for subsequent research. RESULTS: The annotated corpus consists of 11 434 sentences and 89 942 tokens, annotated with 11 124 annotations for medical entities and 3118 annotations of related attributes. We publish 75% of the corpus as a set of shuffled sentences, and keep 25% as held-out data set for unbiased evaluation of future IE tools. On this held-out dataset, our baselines reach depending on the specific entity types F1-scores of 0.72-0.90 for named entity recognition, 0.10-0.68 for entity normalization, 0.55 for negation detection, and 0.33 for speculation detection. DISCUSSION: Medical corpus annotation is a complex and time-consuming task. This makes sharing of such resources even more important. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, BRONCO is the first sizable and freely available German medical corpus. Our baseline results show that more research efforts are necessary to lift the quality of information extraction in German medical texts to the level already possible for English.

Topics & Concepts

AnnotationComputer scienceGermanNatural language processingConsistency (knowledge bases)Information retrievalArtificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)Markup languageWorld Wide WebLinguisticsXMLPhilosophyProgramming languageBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic ModelingText Readability and Simplification