Litcius/Paper detail

The social media commons: Public sphere, agonism, and algorithmic obligation

Brian Collins, José Marichal, Richard M. Neve

2020Journal of Information Technology & Politics24 citationsDOI

Abstract

This paper takes a unique approach to framing the political obligation social media companies like Twitter and Facebook have in a democratic society by casting the public sphere as a common-pool resource. Over the last decade or so much of our civic discourse has moved to social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. This paper argues that just as citizens have an obligation to one another, social media companies have an obligation to promote agonistic forms of civic, political discourse through their algorithms. This algorithmic obligation that social media companies have must be reconciled with social media companies’ formulation of their fiduciary shareholder obligations. We posit that a commons based view of social media discourse allows these companies to make both a democratic health and fiduciary interest argument.

Topics & Concepts

ObligationSocial mediaFraming (construction)FiduciaryPoliticsCommonsAgonismPolitical scienceArgument (complex analysis)DemocracyPublic sphereLaw and economicsSociologyPublic relationsLawDutyEngineeringStructural engineeringBiochemistryChemistryHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSocial Media and PoliticsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
The social media commons: Public sphere, agonism, and algorithmic obligation | Litcius