Litcius/Paper detail

Heterologous ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 vaccination induces stronger immune response than homologous ChAdOx1 vaccination: The pragmatic, multi-center, three-arm, partially randomized HEVACC trial

Zoltán Bánki, José Mateus, Annika Rössler, Helena Schäfer, David Bante, Lydia Riepler, Alba Grifoni, Alessandro Sette, Viviana Simon, Barbara Falkensammer, Hanno Ulmer, Bianca Neurauter, Wegene Borena, Petra Flatscher, Lukas Forer, Elisabeth Graf, Gerhard Hausberger, Peter Heininger, Michael Kundi, Christine Mantinger, Conny Ower, Daniel N. Rainer, Magdalena Sacher, Lisa Seekircher, Sebastian Schönherr, Marton Széll, Tobias Trips, Ursula Wiedermann, Peter Willeit, Reinhard Würzner, August Zabernigg, Florian Krammer, Dorotheé von Laer, Daniela Weiskopf, Janine Kimpel

2022EBioMedicine38 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several COVID-19 vaccines have been approved. The mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty, BNT162b2; BNT) and the vector vaccine from AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria, ChAdOx1; AZ) have been widely used. mRNA vaccines induce high antibody and T cell responses, also to SARS-CoV-2 variants, but are costlier and less stable than the slightly less effective vector vaccines. For vector vaccines, heterologous vaccination schedules have generally proven more effective than homologous schedules. METHODS: In the HEVACC three-arm, single-blinded, adaptive design study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04907331), participants between 18 and 65 years with no prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a first dose of AZ or BNT were included. The AZ/AZ and the AZ/BNT arms were randomized (in a 1:1 ratio stratified by sex and trial site) and single-blinded, the third arm (BNT/BNT) was observational. We compared the reactogenicity between the study arms and hypothesized that immunogenicity was higher for the heterologous AZ/BNT compared to the homologous AZ/AZ regimen using neutralizing antibody titers as primary endpoint. FINDINGS: This interim analysis was conducted after 234 participants had been randomized and 254 immunized (N=109 AZ/AZ, N=115 AZ/BNZ, N=30 BNT/BNT). Heterologous AZ/BNT vaccination was well tolerated without study-related severe adverse events. Neutralizing antibody titers on day 30 were statistically significant higher in the AZ/BNT and the BNT/BNT groups than in the AZ/AZ group, for B.1.617.2 (Delta) AZ/AZ median reciprocal titer 75.9 (99.9% CI 58.0 - 132.5), AZ/BNT 571.5 (99.9% CI 396.6 - 733.1), and BNT/BNT 404.5 (99.9% CI 68.3 - 1024). Similarly, the frequency and multifunctionality of spike-specific T cell responses was comparable between the AZ/BNT and the BNT/BNT groups, but lower in the AZ/AZ vaccinees. INTERPRETATION: This study clearly shows the immunogenicity and safety of heterologous AZ/BNT vaccination and encourages further studies on heterologous vaccination schedules. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Medical University of Innsbruck, and partially funded by NIAID contracts No. 75N9301900065, 75N93021C00016, and 75N93019C00051.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineVaccinationImmunogenicityReactogenicityHeterologousRegimenTiterRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineImmunologyAntibodyBiologyBiochemistryGeneSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections Studiesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches