Litcius/Paper detail

Direct comparisons of European primary and secondary frequency standards via satellite techniques

F Riedel, A Al-Masoudi, E Benkler, S Dörscher, V Gerginov, C Grebing, S Häfner, N Huntemann, B Lipphardt, C Lisdat, E Peik, D Piester, C Sanner, C Tamm, S Weyers, H Denker, L Timmen, C Voigt, D Calonico, G Cerretto, G A Costanzo, F Levi, I Sesia, J Achkar, J Guéna, M Abgrall, D Rovera, B Chupin, C Shi, S Bilicki, E Bookjans, J Lodewyck, R Le Targat, P Delva, S Bize, F N Baynes, C F A Baynham, W Bowden, P Gill, R M Godun, I R Hill, R Hobson, J M Jones, S A King, P B R Nisbet-Jones, A Rolland, S L Shemar, P B Whibberley, H S Margolis

2020Metrologia36 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract We carried out a 26-day comparison of five simultaneously operated optical clocks and six atomic fountain clocks located at INRIM, LNE-SYRTE, NPL and PTB by using two satellite-based frequency comparison techniques: broadband Two-Way Satellite Time and Frequency Transfer (TWSTFT) and Global Positioning System Precise Point Positioning (GPS PPP). With an enhanced statistical analysis procedure taking into account correlations and gaps in the measurement data, combined overall uncertainties in the range of 1.8 × 10 −16 to 3.5 × 10 −16 for the optical clock comparisons were found. The comparison of the fountain clocks yields results with a maximum relative frequency difference of 6.9 × 10 −16 , and combined overall uncertainties in the range of 4.8 × 10 −16 to 7.7 × 10 −16 .

Topics & Concepts

SatelliteRemote sensingFrequency standardRange (aeronautics)BroadbandEnvironmental scienceAtomic clockTime transferPrimary standardGlobal Positioning SystemGeodesyComputer sciencePoint (geometry)FrequencyStatistical analysisOpticsTelecommunicationsPrecise Point PositioningPrimary (astronomy)Communications satelliteFountainPhysicsMeteorologyAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsGNSS positioning and interferenceAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research