Litcius/Paper detail

Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tasmania del Pino‐Sedeño, Diego Infante‐Ventura, Aythami de Armas‐Castellano, Pedro de Pablos‐Rodríguez, Antonio Rueda‐Domínguez, Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar, María M. Trujillo‐Martín

2022European Urology Open Science15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Context: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common type of cancer in men. Individualized risk stratification is crucial to adjust decision-making. A variety of molecular biomarkers have been developed in order to identify patients at risk of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined by the most common PCa risk stratification systems. Objective: The present study aims to examine the effectiveness (diagnostic accuracy) of blood or urine-based PCa biomarkers to identify patients at high risk of csPCa. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2021. Randomized or nonrandomized clinical trials, and cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were obtained. Evidence synthesis: = 34 287) were included. Not all studies included prostate-specific antigen-selected patients. The pooled data showed that the Prostate Health Index (PHI), with any cutoff point between 15 and 30, had sensitivity of 0.95-1.00 and specificity of 0.14-0.33 for csPCa detection. The pooled estimates for SelectMDx test sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 and 0.49, respectively. Conclusions: The PHI test has a high diagnostic accuracy rate for csPCa detection, and its incorporation in the diagnostic process could reduce unnecessary biopsies. However, there is a lack of evidence on patient-important outcomes and thus more research is needed. Patient summary: It has been possible to verify that the application of biomarkers could help detect prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a higher risk of poorer evolution. The Prostate Health Index shows an ability to identify 95-100 for every 100 patients suffering from clinically significant PCa who take the test, preventing unnecessary biopsies in 14-33% of men without PCa or insignificant PCa.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineProstate cancerMeta-analysisInternal medicineReceiver operating characteristicSystematic reviewRandomized controlled trialOncologyMEDLINEStage (stratigraphy)CohortProstateCancerPolitical scienceBiologyLawPaleontologyProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchClusterin in disease pathology
Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | Litcius