Litcius/Paper detail

Secondary analyses to test the impact on inequalities and uptake of the schools-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme by stage of implementation of a new consent policy in the south-west of England

Harriet Fisher, Karen Evans, Rosy Reynolds, Julie Yates, Marion Roderick, Jo Ferrie, John Macleod, Matthew Hickman, Suzanne Audrey

2021BMJ Open19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the impact on inequalities and uptake of the schools-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme by stage of implementation of a new policy providing additional opportunities to consent. SETTING: Two local authorities in the south-west of England. PARTICIPANTS: Young women (n=7129) routinely eligible for HPV vaccination aged 12-13 years during the intervention period (2017/2018 to 2018/2019 programme years). INTERVENTIONS: Local policy change that included additional opportunities to provide consent (parental verbal consent and adolescent self-consent). OUTCOMES: Secondary analyses of cross-sectional intervention data were undertaken to examine uptake by: (1) receipt of parental written consent forms and; (2) percentage of unvaccinated young women by stage of implementation. RESULTS: During the intervention period, 6341 (89.0%) eligible young women initiated the HPV vaccination series. Parental written consent forms were less likely to be returned where young women attended alternative education provider settings (p<0.001), belonged to non-white British ethnic groups (p<0.01) or more deprived quintiles (p<0.001). Implementation of parental verbal consent and adolescent self-consent reduced the percentage of unvaccinated young women from 21.3% to 16.5% (risk difference: 4.8%). The effect was greater for young women belonging to the most deprived compared with the least deprived quintile (risk difference: 7.4% vs 2.3%, p<0.001), and for young women classified as Unknown ethnic category compared with white British young women (6.7% vs 4.2%, p<0.001). No difference was found for non-white British young women (5.4%, p<0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Local policy change to consent procedures that allowed parents to consent verbally and adolescents to self-consent overcame some of the barriers to vaccination of young women belonging to families less likely to respond to paper-based methods of gaining consent and at greater risk of developing cervical cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 49 086 105.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineEthnic groupVaccinationParental consentHuman papillomavirusInformed consentYoung adultDemographyFamily medicineIntervention (counseling)ReceiptWhite BritishInequalityPediatricsGerontologyEnvironmental healthAlternative medicineNursingPopulationImmunologyInternal medicineLawPathologySociologyMathematical analysisPolitical scienceMathematicsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchEthics in Clinical ResearchVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Secondary analyses to test the impact on inequalities and uptake of the schools-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme by stage of implementation of a new consent policy in the south-west of England | Litcius