Litcius/Paper detail

PASS-01: Randomized Phase II Trial of Modified FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel and Molecular Correlatives for Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Jennifer J. Knox, Grainne M. O’Kane, Daniel A. King, Daniel A. Laheru, Amber N. Habowski, Kenneth H. Yu, Kimberly Perez, Andrew J. Aguirre, Zachary Coyne, Harry Harvey, Ronan Andrew McLaughlin, Raymond Jang, Robert C. Grant, Elena Elimova, Daniel J. Renouf, Sandra E. Fischer, Kai Duan, Stephanie Ramotar, Gun Ho Jang, Amy X. Zhang, Craig Devoe, Harshabad Singh, Michael J. Pishvaian, Fieke E. M. Froeling, Wasif M. Saif, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Erica S. Tsang, Brian M. Wolpin, Julie M. Wilson, Anna Dodd, Trevor J. Pugh, Xiang Y. Ye, Steven Gallinger, David A. Tuveson, Faiyaz Notta, Elizabeth M. Jaffee

2025Journal of Clinical Oncology22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE To assess modified folinic acid/leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX [mFFX]) versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in de novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and explore predictive biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to mFFX or GnP with exclusion of germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 . The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) between arms with 0.3 significance. The per-protocol (PP) population included patients who received one dose of chemotherapy. Pretreatment biopsies underwent whole-genome/transcriptome sequencing and patient-derived organoid (PDO) development, providing correlate recommendations at a molecular tumor board and outcomes assessed according to RNA signatures (basal-like v classical). RESULTS Of 160 patients randomly assigned (80 mFFX, 80 GnP), 140 patients were in the PP population (71 mFFX, 69 GnP), with median follow-up of 8.3 months. The median PFS was 4.0 months for mFFX versus 5.3 months for GnP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.92]; P = .069) in intention-to-treat. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.5 months with mFFX and 9.7 months with GnP (HR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.08 to 2.28]; P = .017). Genomic data were generated in 94%, transcriptomes in 74%, and PDOs in 50%. The median PFS for those with basal-like was 3.0 (mFFX) and 5.5 (GnP) months ( P = .17), and classical PDAC was 6.3 (mFFX) versus 5.4 (GnP) months ( P = .36). The median OS in basal-like was 7.5 (mFFX) and 8.9 (GnP) months ( P = .75) versus in classical OS was 9.7 (mFFX) and 13.9 (GnP) months ( P = .047). Overall, 75 (54%) of patients received second-line treatment, 33/75 (44%) correlate-guided. The median time on second-line treatment was only 2.1 months with a median OS of 5.4 months for a correlate-guided choice versus 4.4 months on a standard chemotherapy approach ( P = .45). CONCLUSION In the phase II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Signature Stratification for Treatment-01 (PASS-01) trial population, PFS was similar between GnP and mFFX; however, OS and safety trends favored GnP. The second-line setting appears inadequate to offer precision choices, given the short survival observed.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineFOLFIRINOXInternal medicineOncologyPancreatic cancerMetastatic adenocarcinomaPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaAdenocarcinomaPhases of clinical researchOverall survivalChemotherapyGastroenterologyOxaliplatinGemcitabineClinical trialRandomized controlled trialToxicityProgression-free survivalMetastasisClinical endpointPancreatic diseaseSurgeryFluorouracilPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsRenal cell carcinoma treatment