Litcius/Paper detail

Stone Care Triage During COVID-19 at the University of Washington

Ian Metzler, Mathew D. Sorensen, Robert Sweet, Jonathan D. Harper

2020Journal of Endourology25 citationsDOI

Abstract

Journal of EndourologyVol. 34, No. 5 CommentaryFree AccessStone Care Triage During COVID-19 at the University of WashingtonIan S. Metzler, Mathew D. Sorensen, Robert M. Sweet, and Jonathan D. HarperIan S. MetzlerDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.Search for more papers by this author, Mathew D. SorensenDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.Search for more papers by this author, Robert M. SweetDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.Search for more papers by this author, and Jonathan D. HarperAddress correspondence to: Jonathan D. Harper, MD, Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356420, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-6420, USA E-mail Address: [email protected]Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:14 May 2020https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.29080.ismAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (COVID-19) has caused widespread disruption of routine surgical care and forced every surgeon to make triage decisions, in some geographic areas on par with war-time medicine. Our treatment choices now require greater ethical and community health consideration. We must balance the surgical risks and benefits and the medical risks of any perceived delay in treatment, with the costs of utilizing limited personal protective equipment (PPE) and potential exposure of health care workers and/or patients to the deadly virus. The mandate to postpone all “elective” surgical cases by the University of Washington (UW) on March 16th following recommendations by the American College of Surgeons and US Surgeon General1 was an important step in conserving health care resources as we prepared for the expected surge of COVID-19 cases, but the clinical reality is not so black-and-white. Debates ensued with regard to cancer care and other disease states at an institutional and more widespread level, many taking place on social media.Acute kidney stone care is arguably the most common urologic issue our specialty confronts on a routine basis. In contrast to complex cancer care, the majority of urologists are involved in decisions with management of acute nephrolithiasis. Urgency of care is a spectrum, with case by case considerations, and sometimes treating sooner may limit exposures or greater resource expenditures later. The acuity of presentation can range from emergent (infected obstructing ureteral stones) to completely nonurgent (nonobstructing renal stones) with varying and fluid scenarios between, influenced by degree of symptoms, duration of obstruction, presence of indwelling stent, and likelihood of using the emergency department or other health care. Considering principles of the American Urological Association/Endourological Society Surgical Management of Stones Guidelines from 2016,2 here we provide a triage framework that was created and implemented within the UW Medicine Health System to align all providers evaluating stone patients, to facilitate decisions on surgical care, to advocate level of acuity to operating room administration, and, importantly, to prioritize which patients to treat first as operations return to normal after creating a large expected backlog of cases.We categorized patients into five groups (see Table 1): 0—emergent cases are any patients who would be added on to the operating room (OR) emergently because of life- or organ-threatening conditions that must be immediately resolved, either with drainage or treatment. 1—Urgent cases are patients with obstructing or ureteral stones that have or will likely fail conservative management and require significant health care resources because of hospitalization or multiple emergency visits. 2—Short wait cases are those with symptomatic stones because of pain or infections that can be managed medically without admission and are not expected to threaten kidney failure. 3—Long wait cases are those patients with stones temporized by ureteral stenting or nephrostomy drainage without the need for medical management of symptoms. 4—Postpone cases are those patients who can be delayed until the prior are completed and include asymptomatic nonobstructing stone in patients with low risk of infections, including the majority of renal stones >2 cm or staghorn stones without obstruction that would normally require percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Table 1. Categories of Urgency for prioritization of kidney stone procedures during COVID-19AKI = acute kidney injury; MET = medical expulsive therapy; NT = nephrostomy tube; PCNL = percutaneous nephrolithotomy.It is important to note that this framework is meant to provide a structure for case-by-case consideration, as there are many nuances contributing to individualized care that could shift a patient between categorization levels of urgency. Comorbidities such as immunocompromise, frailty, diabetes, or renal dysfunction should be specially considered and balanced with the risks of exposure to the virus versus delaying. When treatment can be completed in one procedure with few additional resources, it is recommended to treat a stone versus temporary drainage only (e.g., ureteral stent) to potentially minimize repeated health care exposures and resource expenditure. Although shockwave lithotripsy is an option for the appropriate patient and may use less PPE for a single procedure, at our institution, it was felt that ureteroscopy was preferred given higher stone-free rate, less need for retreatment, and that general anesthesia is used for both cases.3Table 1 timelines provide rough scheduling periods for providers and surgery schedulers but are dependent on local resources and evolving restrictions.This framework has been incorporated into a weekly UW stone-specific endourology conference to discuss any nonemergent cases for decisions on who to schedule for the OR within the week versus further delay. For those delayed, close follow-up is recommended by phone or telehealth, and change in categorization may occur if a clinical situation changes. For the 2 weeks between March 15th to 31st, 25 scheduled cases were postponed, 6 new patients were added to the surgery queue, and 12 underwent a procedure, including 3 (7%) 0—emergent and 9 (21%) 1—urgent cases. For the delayed cases, we categorized 10 (23%) as 2—short wait, 8 (19%) as 3—long wait, and 13 (30%) as 4—postpone. Categorization at this level provides greater granularity to manage patients, consistency between team members, including independently practicing advanced practice providers, and a communication tool with the OR scheduling staff to facilitate equitable OR utilization. At the UW as of March 30th, all nonemergent cases are being tested for COVID-19 preoperatively in the 48–72 hours before planned OR, alleviating some concern for health care workers. The endourology section has also shifted to an attending of the week for these cases to help preserve the workforce. As the COVID-19 crisis resolves regionally, categorization will allow quick and equitable prioritization of patients as normal hospital operations resume.References1. COVID-19: Recommendations for management of elective surgical procedures. www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance Google Scholar2. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VMJ, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART 1. J Urol. 2016 Oct; 196 (4). Google Scholar3. Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX, McClinton S, Nabi G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD006029. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4. Crossref, Google ScholarAbbreviations UsedAKIacute kidney injuryAUAamerican urological associationCOVID-19SARS-COV-2 pandemicEDemergency departmentMETmedical expulsive therapyNTnephrostomy tubeORoperating roomPCNLpercutaneous nephrolithotomyPPEpersonal protective equipmentUWUniversity of WashingtonFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDouble J Stents and Reno–Ureteral Lithiasis: Dynamic Changes in Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic25 October 2023 | Life, Vol. 13, No. 11ВПЛИВ СТУПЕНЯ ПОРУШЕННЯ ОБМІНУ МІНЕРАЛЬНИХ СОЛЕЙ НА ФУНКЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ СТАН НЕРВОВО-М’ЯЗОВИХ СТРУКТУР СЕЧОВОГО МІХУРА ТА ЙОГО СФІНКТЕРНОГО АПАРАТУ В ХВОРИХ НА СЕЧОКАМ’ЯНУ ХВОРОБУ З ПОСТКОВІДНИМ СИНДРОМОМ23 August 2023 | Здобутки клінічної і експериментальної медицини, No. 3Impact of COVID ‐19 on the management and outcomes of ureteric stones in the UK : a multicentre retrospective study19 October 2022 | BJU International, Vol. 131, No. 1Comparison of Management and Outcomes of Symptomatic Urolithiasis During the COVID-19 Pandemic to a Comparative CohortUrology, Vol. 165Consensus Statement on Urinary Stone Treatment During a Pandemic: A Delphi Process from the Endourological Society TOWER Research Initiative Kymora B. Scotland, Thomas Tailly, Ben H. Chew, Naeem Bhojani, Daron Smith, , Husain Alenezi, Seth K. Bechis, Darren Beiko, Saeed bin Hamri, Marianne Brehmer, N. Allen Chiura, Steve Doizi, Otas R. Durutovic, Mohamed A. Elshazly, Marawan M. El Tayeb, Esteban Emiliani, Dimitry Enikeev, Yasser A. Farahat, Nariman Gadzhiev, Vineet Gauhar, Mariano S. Gonzalez, Shuzo Hamamoto, Johann P. Ingimarsson, Takaaki Inoue, Helene U. Jung, Lisa Kaestner, Cyril Kamadjou, Guido M. Kamphuis, Peter Kronenberg, Mohammed Lezrek, Jianxing Li, Todd G. Manning, Braulio O. Manzo, Carlos E. Mendez-Probst, Duvdevani Mordechai, Andreas Neisius, Shinsuke Okada, Kenneth T. Pace, Athanasios G. Papatsoris, Gyan Parikh, Jake M. Patterson, Satyendra Persaud, Silvia Proietti, Marcelino E. Rivera, Nicholas J. Rukin, Avinash K. Singh, Boyke Soebhali, Guan Hee Tan, Yiloren Tanidir, Ehab R. Tawfiek, Fabio C. Vicentini, Florian M.E. Wagenlehner, Daniel A. Wollin, and Guohua Zeng15 March 2022 | Journal of Endourology, Vol. 36, No. 3Changes in practice patterns of nephrolithiasis in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a review24 December 2021 | Current Opinion in Urology, Vol. 32, No. 2The development and application of a triage system for urolithiasis during COVID-1911 November 2021 | World Journal of Urology, Vol. 40, No. 2Impact of COVID-19 on endourology surgical practice in Saudi Arabia: A national multicenter studyAsian Journal of Urology, Vol. 8, No. 4An Italian multicenter analysis of emergency admissions and treatment of upper tract urolithiasis during the lockdown and reopening phases of the COVID‐19 pandemic: Are we ready for a second wave of the outbreak?22 June 2021 | International Journal of Urology, Vol. 28, No. 9Urologic Emergency Care in the COVID‐19 Pandemic Era7 May 2021Decision making and treatment options in endourology post-coronavirus disease 2019 – adapting to the future31 December 2020 | Current Opinion in Urology, Vol. 31, No. 2Urolithiasis treatment options during COVID-19 pandemic: review of current recommendations and triage systems25 November 2020 | African Journal of Urology, Vol. 26, No. 1Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-1923 November 2020 | World Journal of Urology, Vol. 72El impacto de la COVID-19 en las admisiones al servicio de urgencias, hospitalizaciones y manejo clínico de la urolitiasis en el centro de Italia: análisis multicéntricoActas Urológicas Españolas, Vol. 44, No. 9The impact of COVID-19 outbreak on urolithiasis emergency department admissions, hospitalizations and clinical management in central Italy: a multicentric analysisActas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition), Vol. 44, No. 9A Systematic Review on Guidelines and Recommendations for Urology Standard of Care During the COVID-19 PandemicEuropean Urology Focus, Vol. 6, No. 5Endourology (Lithiasis). Management, surgical considerations and follow-up of patients in the COVID-19 era1 July 2020 | International braz j urol, Vol. 46, No. suppl 1 Volume 34Issue 5May 2020 InformationCopyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Ian S. Metzler, Mathew D. Sorensen, Robert M. Sweet, and Jonathan D. Harper.Stone Care Triage During COVID-19 at the University of Washington.Journal of Endourology.May 2020.539-540.http://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.29080.ismPublished in Volume: 34 Issue 5: May 14, 2020Online Ahead of Print:April 17, 2020PDF download

Topics & Concepts

TriageMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health carePandemicFamily medicineLibrary scienceMedical emergencyPolitical scienceInternal medicineLawInfectious disease (medical specialty)Computer scienceDiseaseHealthcare cost, quality, practicesCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Stone Care Triage During COVID-19 at the University of Washington | Litcius