Litcius/Paper detail

Prevalence of neural collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training

Vardan Papyan, X. Y. Han, David L. Donoho

2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences334 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

(NC), involving four deeply interconnected phenomena. (NC1) Cross-example within-class variability of last-layer training activations collapses to zero, as the individual activations themselves collapse to their class means. (NC2) The class means collapse to the vertices of a simplex equiangular tight frame (ETF). (NC3) Up to rescaling, the last-layer classifiers collapse to the class means or in other words, to the simplex ETF (i.e., to a self-dual configuration). (NC4) For a given activation, the classifier's decision collapses to simply choosing whichever class has the closest train class mean (i.e., the nearest class center [NCC] decision rule). The symmetric and very simple geometry induced by the TPT confers important benefits, including better generalization performance, better robustness, and better interpretability.

Topics & Concepts

InterpretabilityComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRobustness (evolution)SimplexAlgorithmMachine learningMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)CombinatoricsChemistryGeneBiochemistryAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNeural Networks and Applications
Prevalence of neural collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training | Litcius