Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer
Nadia Øgaard, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Mai‐Britt W. Ørntoft, Christina Demuth, Mads H. Rasmussen, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Jesper Nors, Amanda Frydendahl, Iben Lyskjær, Marijana Nesic, Christina Therkildsen, Jakob Kleif, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, Jesper Vilandt, Jakob Benedict Seidelin, Kåre Anderson Gotschalck, Claudia Jaensch, Berit Andersen, Uffe S. Løve, Ole Thorlacius‐Ussing, Per Vadgaard Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis H. Schlesinger, Lene Hjerrild Iversen, Morten Rasmussen, Ismail Gögenür, Jesper B. Bramsen, Claus L. Andersen
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a 'low-ctDNA-shedding' and 'less-aggressive' subgroup. METHODS: ctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722). RESULTS: After adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2-0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5-0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3-1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2-0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a 'low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk' subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.