Efficacy of Epidural Blood Patching or Surgery in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map
Timothy J. Amrhein, John W Williams, Linda Gray, Michael D. Malinzak, Sarah Cantrell, Connie Deline, Carrie M. Carr, Dong Kun Kim, Karen M. Goldstein, Peter G. Kranz
Abstract
<h3>BACKGROUND:</h3> Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is an important cause of treatable secondary headaches. Evidence on the efficacy of epidural blood patching and surgery for spontaneous intracranial hypotension has not been synthesized. <h3>PURPOSE:</h3> Our aim was to identify evidence clusters and knowledge gaps in the efficacy of treatments for spontaneous intracranial hypotension to prioritize future research. <h3>DATA SOURCES:</h3> We searched published English language articles on MEDLINE (Ovid), the Web of Science (Clarivate), and EMBASE (Elsevier) from inception until October 29, 2021. <h3>STUDY SELECTION:</h3> We reviewed experimental, observational, and systematic review studies assessing the efficacy of epidural blood patching or surgery in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. <h3>DATA ANALYSIS:</h3> One author performed data extraction, and a second verified it. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or adjudicated by a third author. <h3>DATA SYNTHESIS:</h3> One hundred thirty-nine studies were included (median, 14 participants; range, 3–298 participants). Most articles were published in the past decade. Most assessed epidural blood patching outcomes. No studies met level 1 evidence. Most were retrospective cohort or case series (92.1%, <i>n</i> = 128). A few compared the efficacy of different treatments (10.8%, <i>n</i> = 15). Most used objective methods for the diagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (62.3%, <i>n</i> = 86); however, 37.7% (<i>n</i> = 52) did not clearly meet the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 criteria. CSF leak type was unclear in 77.7% (<i>n</i> = 108). Nearly all reported patient symptoms using unvalidated measures (84.9%, <i>n</i> = 118). Outcomes were rarely collected at uniform prespecified time points. <h3>LIMITATIONS:</h3> The investigation did not include transvenous embolization of CSF-to-venous fistulas. <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> Evidence gaps demonstrate a need for prospective study designs, clinical trials, and comparative studies. We recommend using the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 diagnostic criteria, explicit reporting of CSF leak subtype, inclusion of key procedural details, and using objective validated outcome measures collected at uniform time points.